Authors' Affiliations: Cancer Therapeutics Program, and Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria; The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba; Queensland Institute of Medical Research; and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Cancer Res. 2013 Dec 15;73(24):7265-76. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0890. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Cell-intrinsic effects such as induction of apoptosis and/or inhibition of cell proliferation have been proposed as the major antitumor responses to histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). These compounds can also mediate immune-modulatory effects that may contribute to their anticancer effects. However, HDACi can also induce anti-inflammatory, and potentially immunosuppressive, outcomes. We therefore sought to clarify the role of the immune system in mediating the efficacy of HDACi in a physiologic setting, using preclinical, syngeneic murine models of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. We showed an intact immune system was required for the robust anticancer effects of the HDACi vorinostat and panobinostat against a colon adenocarcinoma and two aggressive models of leukemia/lymphoma. Importantly, although HDACi-treated immunocompromised mice bearing established lymphoma succumbed to disease significantly earlier than tumor bearing, HDACi-treated wild-type (WT) mice, treatment with the conventional chemotherapeutic etoposide equivalently enhanced the survival of both strains. IFN-γ and tumor cell signaling through IFN-γR were particularly important for the anticancer effects of HDACi, and vorinostat and IFN-γ acted in concert to enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells. Furthermore, we show that a combination of vorinostat with α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer), an IFN-γ-inducing agent, was significantly more potent against established lymphoma than vorinostat treatment alone. Intriguingly, B cells, but not natural killer cells or CD8(+) T cells, were implicated as effectors of the vorinostat antitumor immune response. Together, our data suggest HDACi are immunostimulatory during cancer treatment and that combinatorial therapeutic regimes with immunotherapies should be considered in the clinic.
细胞内在效应,如诱导细胞凋亡和/或抑制细胞增殖,被认为是组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂 (HDACi) 的主要抗肿瘤反应。这些化合物还可以介导免疫调节作用,这可能有助于它们的抗癌作用。然而,HDACi 也可以诱导抗炎和潜在的免疫抑制作用。因此,我们试图在生理环境中使用血液恶性肿瘤和实体瘤的同种异体小鼠模型来阐明免疫系统在介导 HDACi 疗效中的作用。我们表明,完整的免疫系统是 HDACi 治疗结肠癌和两种侵袭性白血病/淋巴瘤模型的强大抗癌作用所必需的。重要的是,尽管接受 HDACi 治疗的患有已建立淋巴瘤的免疫功能低下的小鼠比患有肿瘤的小鼠更早地死于疾病,但接受 HDACi 治疗的野生型 (WT) 小鼠,用常规化疗药物依托泊苷治疗,同样增强了两种品系的存活率。IFN-γ 和通过 IFN-γR 的肿瘤细胞信号对于 HDACi 的抗癌作用特别重要,而且 vorinostat 和 IFN-γ 协同作用增强了肿瘤细胞的免疫原性。此外,我们表明,与 α-半乳糖神经酰胺 (α-GalCer) 的组合,一种 IFN-γ 诱导剂,对已建立的淋巴瘤的疗效明显优于单独使用 vorinostat。有趣的是,B 细胞而不是自然杀伤细胞或 CD8(+) T 细胞被认为是 vorinostat 抗肿瘤免疫反应的效应物。总之,我们的数据表明,HDACi 在癌症治疗期间具有免疫刺激作用,并且应该在临床上考虑与免疫疗法的联合治疗方案。