• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非典型组合和科学影响。

Atypical combinations and scientific impact.

机构信息

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2013 Oct 25;342(6157):468-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1240474.

DOI:10.1126/science.1240474
PMID:24159044
Abstract

Novelty is an essential feature of creative ideas, yet the building blocks of new ideas are often embodied in existing knowledge. From this perspective, balancing atypical knowledge with conventional knowledge may be critical to the link between innovativeness and impact. Our analysis of 17.9 million papers spanning all scientific fields suggests that science follows a nearly universal pattern: The highest-impact science is primarily grounded in exceptionally conventional combinations of prior work yet simultaneously features an intrusion of unusual combinations. Papers of this type were twice as likely to be highly cited works. Novel combinations of prior work are rare, yet teams are 37.7% more likely than solo authors to insert novel combinations into familiar knowledge domains.

摘要

新颖性是创意的一个基本特征,但新想法的基础往往体现在现有知识中。从这个角度来看,平衡非典型知识和常规知识对于创新性和影响力之间的联系可能至关重要。我们对涵盖所有科学领域的 1790 万篇论文进行的分析表明,科学遵循一种近乎普遍的模式:最具影响力的科学主要基于先前工作中异常常规的组合,但同时也具有不寻常组合的入侵。这类论文成为高引用论文的可能性是两倍。先前工作的新颖组合很少见,但团队将新颖组合插入熟悉的知识领域的可能性比单独作者高 37.7%。

相似文献

1
Atypical combinations and scientific impact.非典型组合和科学影响。
Science. 2013 Oct 25;342(6157):468-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1240474.
2
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估:资源有限的发展中国家为科学产出做出有效贡献的途径。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Nov;14(6):370-7.
3
The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow's breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot.过去知识的年龄与明天科学技术突破之间几乎普遍存在的联系:热点。
Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 19;3(4):e1601315. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601315. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
5
Cultivating creativity in conservation science.在保护科学中培养创造力。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):345-53. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12173. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
6
From Something Old to Something New: Functionalist Lessons for the Cognitive Science of Scientific Creativity.从旧事物到新事物:科学创造力认知科学的功能主义启示
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 17;12:750086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750086. eCollection 2021.
7
Active research fields in anesthesia: a document co-citation analysis of the anesthetic literature.麻醉学的活跃研究领域:麻醉学文献的文献共被引分析
Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1524-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d18a1.
8
The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.骨科手术100篇经典论文:文献计量分析
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Oct;92(10):1338-43. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24867.
9
The role of pattern recognition in creative problem solving: a case study in search of new mathematics for biology.模式识别在创造性问题解决中的作用:生物学新数学方法的探索案例研究。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013 Sep;113(1):181-215. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
10
One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals.普通外科期刊中的100篇引用经典文献。
World J Surg. 2002 Sep;26(9):1099-105. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6376-7. Epub 2002 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Tenure and research trajectories.任期与研究轨迹。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 29;122(30):e2500322122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500322122. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
A Global Dataset Mapping the AI Innovation from Academic Research to Industrial Patents.一个将人工智能创新从学术研究映射到工业专利的全球数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 18;12(1):1261. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05518-3.
3
Positive genetic interactions: high impact, but underrepresented in the literature.正向基因相互作用:影响重大,但在文献中报道不足。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 27:2025.06.25.661621. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.25.661621.
4
The Evolving Field of Cardio-Rheumatology: Global Patterns and Research Gaps, 1953-2025.心血管风湿病学的发展领域:1953年至2025年的全球模式与研究差距
Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87901. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87901. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Implementing team science in undergraduate medical physics research.在本科医学物理研究中实施团队科学。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70169. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70169.
6
Creativity across domains: Thoughts in Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Computer Science, Technology, and Art.跨领域创造力:科学、工程、数学、计算机科学、技术和艺术领域的思考
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jul 1;4(7):pgaf174. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf174. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
Science Speed Dating to Spur Inter-Institutional Collaborative Research.科学速配以促进机构间合作研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;22(6):919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060919.
8
The pivot penalty in research.研究中的关键处罚。
Nature. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1.
9
Membership in team science institute enhances diversity of researchers' collaboration networks.加入团队科学研究所可增强研究人员合作网络的多样性。
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0322943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322943. eCollection 2025.
10
Are groundbreaking science discoveries becoming harder to find?具有开创性的科学发现是否越来越难找到了?
Nature. 2025 May;641(8064):836-839. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-01548-4.