• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估访谈员对邻里特征观察的测量误差属性。

Assessing the measurement error properties of interviewer observations of neighbourhood characteristics.

作者信息

Casas-Cordero C, Kreuter F, Wang Y, Babey S

出版信息

J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2013 Jan 1;176(1):227-249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01065.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01065.x
PMID:24159255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3804382/
Abstract

Interviewer observations made during the process of data collection are currently used to inform responsive design decisions, to expand the set of covariates for nonresponse adjustments, to explain participation in surveys, and to assess nonresponse bias. However, little effort has been made to assess the quality of such interviewer observations. Using data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighbourhood Survey (L.A.FANS), this paper examines measurement error properties of interviewer observations of neighbourhood characteristics. Block level and interviewer covariates are used in multilevel models to explain interviewer variation in the observations of neighbourhood features.

摘要

在数据收集过程中进行的访谈者观察目前被用于为适应性设计决策提供信息,扩展用于无应答调整的协变量集,解释调查参与情况,并评估无应答偏差。然而,在评估此类访谈者观察的质量方面所做的工作很少。本文利用洛杉矶家庭与社区调查(L.A.FANS)的数据,研究了访谈者对社区特征观察的测量误差属性。在多层次模型中使用街区层面和访谈者协变量来解释访谈者在社区特征观察方面的差异。

相似文献

1
Assessing the measurement error properties of interviewer observations of neighbourhood characteristics.评估访谈员对邻里特征观察的测量误差属性。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2013 Jan 1;176(1):227-249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01065.x.
2
Determinants of unit nonresponse in multi-mode data collection: A multilevel analysis.多模式数据收集中单位无应答的决定因素:多层次分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 26;14(4):e0215652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215652. eCollection 2019.
3
Sources of Variance in the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations.访谈者观察准确性的方差来源。
Sociol Methods Res. 2019 Aug;48(3):485-533. doi: 10.1177/0049124117729698. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
4
Strategies for Increasing the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations of Respondent Features: Evidence from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth.提高访谈者对受访者特征观察准确性的策略:来自美国全国家庭成长调查的证据。
Methodology (Gott). 2018 Jan;14(1):16-29. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000142. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
5
What They Expect Is What You Get: The Role of Interviewer Expectations in Nonresponse to Income and Asset Questions.他们所期望的就是你所得到的:访谈者期望在对收入和资产问题无回应中的作用。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov;8(5):851-876. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smz022. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
6
Assessment of Multiple Membership Multilevel Models: An Application to Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse.多成员多层次模型评估:对访员对无回答影响的应用。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):595-611. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1465809. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Presence of and correction for interviewer error on an instrument assessing cognitive function of older adults.评估老年人认知功能的工具中访谈者误差的存在及校正
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Mar;15(3):372-80. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12331. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
Comparing the Ability of Regression Modeling and Bayesian Additive Regression Trees to Predict Costs in a Responsive Survey Design Context.比较回归建模和贝叶斯加法回归树在响应式调查设计背景下预测成本的能力。
J Off Stat. 2020 Dec;36(4):907-931. doi: 10.2478/jos-2020-0043. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Comparing Lay Community and Academic Survey Center Interviewers in Conducting Household Interviews in Latino Communities.比较普通社区和学术调查中心的访谈员在拉丁裔社区进行家庭访谈的情况。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):435-442. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0050.
10
A two-phase sampling survey for nonresponse and its paradata to correct nonresponse bias in a health surveillance survey.一项针对无应答及其辅助数据的两阶段抽样调查,以纠正健康监测调查中的无应答偏差。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Feb;65(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.10.059. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital questionnaire response time (DQRT): A ubiquitous and low-cost digital assay of cognitive processing speed.数字问卷响应时间(DQRT):一种普遍存在且低成本的认知处理速度数字检测方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 17;57(7):200. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02727-x.
2
Factors Associated with Interviewers' Evaluations of Respondents' Performance in Telephone Interviews: Behavior, Response Quality Indicators, and Characteristics of Respondents and Interviewers.电话访谈中与访谈者对受访者表现评估相关的因素:行为、回答质量指标以及受访者和访谈者的特征
Public Opin Q. 2023 Jul 20;87(Suppl 1):480-506. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad028. eCollection 2023.
3
Using Item Response Times in Online Questionnaires to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment.使用在线问卷中的项目反应时间来检测轻度认知障碍
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Aug 2;78(8):1278-1283. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad043.
4
Using Paradata to Evaluate Youth Participation in a Digital Diary Study.利用辅助数据评估青少年在数字日记研究中的参与情况。
Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2021 Aug;39(4):666-686. doi: 10.1177/0894439320929272. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Novel Insights From Interviewer Assessments of Personal Attributes, Home Environment, and Residential Context in NSHAP.从 NSHAP 中访谈评估人员对个人属性、家庭环境和居住环境的新颖见解。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Dec 17;76(Suppl 3):S322-S334. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab176.
6
Principles of Researching Health Disparities in Longitudinal Cohort Studies Enrolling Children.针对儿童的纵向队列研究中健康差异的研究原则。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 19;9:627298. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.627298. eCollection 2021.
7
Who Can You Count On? Understanding The Determinants of Reliability.你能依靠谁?理解可靠性的决定因素。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov;8(5):903-931. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smz034. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
Reading Fast, Reading Slow: The Effect of Interviewers' Speed in Reading Introductory Texts on Response Behavior.快速阅读与慢速阅读:面试官阅读介绍性文本的速度对回答行为的影响
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Apr;8(2):325-351. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smy027. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Sources of Variance in the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations.访谈者观察准确性的方差来源。
Sociol Methods Res. 2019 Aug;48(3):485-533. doi: 10.1177/0049124117729698. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
10
The contributions of paradata and features of respondents, interviewers and survey agencies to panel co-operation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查中辅助数据以及受访者、访谈员和调查机构的特征对小组合作的贡献。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2019 Jan;182(1):3-35. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12391. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The NIfETy method for environmental assessment of neighborhood-level indicators of violence, alcohol, and other drug exposure.邻里层面暴力、酒精及其他药物暴露指标环境评估的NIfETy方法。
Prev Sci. 2008 Dec;9(4):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0107-8. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
2
Physical activity among adolescents. When do parks matter?青少年的体育活动。公园何时发挥作用?
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.020.
3
Assessing the measurement properties of neighborhood scales: from psychometrics to ecometrics.评估邻里尺度的测量属性:从心理测量学到生态测量学。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr 15;165(8):858-67. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm040. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
4
Inter-rater and test-retest reliability: methods and results for the neighborhood observational checklist.评分者间信度和重测信度:邻里观察清单的方法与结果
Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):452-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
5
Direct observation of neighborhood attributes in an urban area of the US south: characterizing the social context of pregnancy.对美国南部城市地区邻里属性的直接观察:描述孕期的社会环境
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Mar 17;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-11.
6
Reliability and validity of observer ratings of neighborhoods.邻里环境观察者评分的信度与效度
J Aging Health. 2006 Feb;18(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/0898264305281001.
7
Neighborhood mechanisms and the spatial dynamics of birth weight.邻里机制与出生体重的空间动态
AJS. 2003 Mar;108(5):976-1017. doi: 10.1086/374405.
8
On weighting the rates in non-response weights.关于对无应答权重中的比率进行加权。
Stat Med. 2003 May 15;22(9):1589-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.1513.
9
Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: a study examining walking to work.探索环境对身体活动的影响:一项关于步行上班的研究
Am J Prev Med. 2002 Aug;23(2 Suppl):36-43. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00472-5.
10
Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health.调查邻里和区域环境对健康的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1783-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1783.