Lepach A C, Daseking M, Petermann F, Waldmann H C
Zentrum für Klinische Psychologie und Rehabilitation der Universität Bremen.
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Nov;75(11):775-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357168. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
This study examines the relationships of intelligence and memory scores derived from WAIS-IV and WMS-IV. We were especially interested in the reciprocal predictive values of the test scales.
A sample of 137 healthy adults with an age range between 16 and 69 years was assessed with the WAIS-IV and the WMS-IV. The test order was balanced. Pearson correlations were conducted on the subtest and scale level. A series of 14 linear regression models was tested with memory performance as predictor for intelligence and vice versa.
A model including the 3 main memory scales of the WMS-IV was able to predict the global IQ best. It nevertheless explained only 46% of the variance. The memory and intelligence measures show significant relationships, but also represent distinct functions. WAIS-IV and WMS-IV complement one another.
本研究考察了源自韦氏成人智力量表第四版（WAIS-IV）和韦氏记忆量表第四版（WMS-IV）的智力和记忆分数之间的关系。我们尤其关注测验量表的相互预测值。
对137名年龄在16至69岁之间的健康成年人样本进行了WAIS-IV和WMS-IV评估。测验顺序是平衡的。在分测验和量表水平上进行了皮尔逊相关性分析。测试了一系列14个线性回归模型，以记忆表现作为智力的预测指标，反之亦然。
一个包含WMS-IV的3个主要记忆量表的模型能够最好地预测总体智商。然而，它仅解释了46%的方差。记忆和智力测量显示出显著关系，但也代表着不同的功能。WAIS-IV和WMS-IV相互补充。
Zotero 插件