Suppr超能文献

含光甘草定和1%氢化可的松的保湿剂治疗儿童特应性皮炎的随机、双盲、双侧对照研究。

Randomized, double-blind, split-side, comparison study of moisturizer containing licochalcone A and 1% hydrocortisone in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis.

作者信息

Wananukul Siriwan, Chatproedprai Susheera, Chunharas Amornsri, Limpongsanuruk Wanida, Singalavanija Srisupalak, Nitiyarom Rattanawalai, Wisuthsarewong Wanee

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Sep;96(9):1135-42.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin lesion in children. Topical corticosteroid is the mainstay of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of moisturizer containing licochalcone A (LicA) and 1% hydrocortisone for the treatment of mild to moderate childhood AD.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a multicenter randomized, prospective, split-side, double-blind study in 55 children between the age of three months and 14 years. Patients with AD were treated twice daily, simultaneously with either Lic A or 1% hydrocortisone on opposite sides of the lesion. The SCORAD and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were performed at the baseline, 2-week, and 4-week visits. Lic A was used on both sides of the body for another four weeks to see the effects and TEWL.

RESULTS

In a randomized period, both products were equally effective in the treatment. SCORAD decreased significantly from baseline for both treatments throughout the first four weeks (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in SCORAD between both treatments (p = 0.321 and p = 0.146 at week 2 and 4, respectively). Lic A had statistically significant decrease in TEWL (p = 0.027 and p = 0.03 at weeks 2 and 4, respectively). One patient had infection on skin lesions of both sides of the body. Forty-three patients continued to the period of using Lic A on both sides of the body. SCORAD and TEWL were comparable to the end of the randomized period and significantly lower from baseline (p < 0.001). Skin lesions flared up in three patients (7.5%).

CONCLUSION

Lic A had a similar result in terms of SCORAD compared to 1% hydrocortisone for the treatment of mild and moderate AD. TEWL was significantly lower than baseline on the side that used Lic A. Continuing use of Lic A for four weeks can maintain clinical and barrier improvement.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎(AD)是儿童常见的慢性炎症性皮肤病变。外用糖皮质激素是主要治疗方法。

目的

比较含光甘草定(LicA)的保湿剂与1%氢化可的松治疗轻度至中度儿童AD的疗效。

材料与方法

这是一项多中心随机、前瞻性、双侧、双盲研究,共纳入55名年龄在3个月至14岁之间的儿童。AD患者每天接受两次治疗,在皮损的对侧同时使用LicA或1%氢化可的松。在基线、2周和4周访视时进行SCORAD和经表皮水分流失(TEWL)评估。LicA在身体两侧再使用四周以观察效果和TEWL。

结果

在随机治疗期,两种产品治疗效果相当。在最初四周内,两种治疗的SCORAD均较基线显著降低(p<0.001)。两种治疗之间的SCORAD无统计学显著差异(第2周和第4周时p分别为0.321和0.146)。LicA治疗的TEWL有统计学显著降低(第2周和第4周时p分别为0.027和0.03)。一名患者身体两侧皮损均发生感染。43名患者进入在身体两侧使用LicA 的阶段。SCORAD和TEWL与随机治疗期末相当,且显著低于基线(p<0.001)。3名患者(7.5%)皮损复发。

结论

在治疗轻度和中度AD方面,LicA与1%氢化可的松相比,在SCORAD方面结果相似。使用LicA一侧的TEWL显著低于基线。继续使用LicA四周可维持临床和屏障功能的改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验