Wananukul Siriwan, Chatproedprai Susheera, Chunharas Amornsri, Limpongsanuruk Wanida, Singalavanija Srisupalak, Nitiyarom Rattanawalai, Wisuthsarewong Wanee
Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Sep;96(9):1135-42.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin lesion in children. Topical corticosteroid is the mainstay of treatment.
To compare the efficacy of moisturizer containing licochalcone A (LicA) and 1% hydrocortisone for the treatment of mild to moderate childhood AD.
This was a multicenter randomized, prospective, split-side, double-blind study in 55 children between the age of three months and 14 years. Patients with AD were treated twice daily, simultaneously with either Lic A or 1% hydrocortisone on opposite sides of the lesion. The SCORAD and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were performed at the baseline, 2-week, and 4-week visits. Lic A was used on both sides of the body for another four weeks to see the effects and TEWL.
In a randomized period, both products were equally effective in the treatment. SCORAD decreased significantly from baseline for both treatments throughout the first four weeks (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in SCORAD between both treatments (p = 0.321 and p = 0.146 at week 2 and 4, respectively). Lic A had statistically significant decrease in TEWL (p = 0.027 and p = 0.03 at weeks 2 and 4, respectively). One patient had infection on skin lesions of both sides of the body. Forty-three patients continued to the period of using Lic A on both sides of the body. SCORAD and TEWL were comparable to the end of the randomized period and significantly lower from baseline (p < 0.001). Skin lesions flared up in three patients (7.5%).
Lic A had a similar result in terms of SCORAD compared to 1% hydrocortisone for the treatment of mild and moderate AD. TEWL was significantly lower than baseline on the side that used Lic A. Continuing use of Lic A for four weeks can maintain clinical and barrier improvement.
特应性皮炎(AD)是儿童常见的慢性炎症性皮肤病变。外用糖皮质激素是主要治疗方法。
比较含光甘草定(LicA)的保湿剂与1%氢化可的松治疗轻度至中度儿童AD的疗效。
这是一项多中心随机、前瞻性、双侧、双盲研究,共纳入55名年龄在3个月至14岁之间的儿童。AD患者每天接受两次治疗,在皮损的对侧同时使用LicA或1%氢化可的松。在基线、2周和4周访视时进行SCORAD和经表皮水分流失(TEWL)评估。LicA在身体两侧再使用四周以观察效果和TEWL。
在随机治疗期,两种产品治疗效果相当。在最初四周内,两种治疗的SCORAD均较基线显著降低(p<0.001)。两种治疗之间的SCORAD无统计学显著差异(第2周和第4周时p分别为0.321和0.146)。LicA治疗的TEWL有统计学显著降低(第2周和第4周时p分别为0.027和0.03)。一名患者身体两侧皮损均发生感染。43名患者进入在身体两侧使用LicA 的阶段。SCORAD和TEWL与随机治疗期末相当,且显著低于基线(p<0.001)。3名患者(7.5%)皮损复发。
在治疗轻度和中度AD方面,LicA与1%氢化可的松相比,在SCORAD方面结果相似。使用LicA一侧的TEWL显著低于基线。继续使用LicA四周可维持临床和屏障功能的改善。