• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者自我管理的甘精胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素强化治疗方案与医生管理的方案相比,能否提供相似的血糖控制效果?APIDRA(赖脯胰岛素)起始治疗达到目标(START)研究结果:一项随机非劣效性试验。

Does a patient-managed insulin intensification strategy with insulin glargine and insulin glulisine provide similar glycemic control as a physician-managed strategy? Results of the START (Self-Titration With Apidra to Reach Target) Study: a randomized noninferiority trial.

机构信息

Corresponding author: Stewart B. Harris,

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):604-10. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1636. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

DOI:10.2337/dc13-1636
PMID:24170757
Abstract

OBJECTIVE Diabetes self-management is universally regarded as a foundation of diabetes care. We determined whether comparable glycemic control could be achieved by self-titration versus physician titration of a once-daily bolus insulin dose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are unable to achieve optimal glycemia control with a basal insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes, an HbA1c level >7% (53 mmol/mol), and either nocturnal hypoglycemia episodes or an insufficient basal insulin glargine level (with or without oral agents) to achieve a fasting plasma glucose level ≤6 mmol/L (108 mg/dL) were studied. Participants all had bolus insulin glulisine added at breakfast and were allocated to either algorithm-guided patient self-titration or physician titration. The primary outcome was an HbA1c level ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS After a mean (SD) follow-up of 159.4 days (36.2 days), 28.4% of participants in the self-titration arm vs. 21.2% in the physician titration arm achieved an HbA1c level of ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia (between-group absolute difference 7.2%; 95% CI -3.2 to 17.7). The lower end of this 95% confidence interval was within the predetermined noninferiority boundary of -5% (P noninferiority = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS In stable patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving doses of basal insulin glargine who require bolus insulin, a simple bolus insulin patient-managed titration algorithm is as effective as a physician-managed algorithm.

摘要

目的

糖尿病自我管理被普遍认为是糖尿病护理的基础。我们旨在确定对于不能通过基础胰岛素实现最佳血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者,能否通过自我滴定与医生滴定每日一次的胰岛素剂量来实现可比的血糖控制。

研究设计和方法

研究纳入了 HbA1c 水平>7%(53mmol/mol)、存在夜间低血糖发作或基础胰岛素甘精胰岛素水平不足(联合或不联合口服药物)导致空腹血糖水平≤6mmol/L(108mg/dL)的 2 型糖尿病患者。所有患者早餐时均添加速效胰岛素赖脯胰岛素,并被分配至接受算法指导的患者自我滴定或医生滴定。主要结局为无严重低血糖的 HbA1c 水平≤7%(53mmol/mol)。

结果

在平均(SD)随访 159.4 天(36.2 天)后,自我滴定组中有 28.4%的参与者达到 HbA1c 水平≤7%(53mmol/mol)而无严重低血糖,而医生滴定组中这一比例为 21.2%(组间绝对差异 7.2%;95%CI-3.2 至 17.7)。该 95%置信区间的下限在预定的-5%非劣效性边界内(P 非劣效性=0.011)。

结论

在接受基础胰岛素甘精胰岛素治疗且需要胰岛素剂量的稳定 2 型糖尿病患者中,简单的胰岛素剂量患者管理滴定算法与医生管理算法同样有效。

相似文献

1
Does a patient-managed insulin intensification strategy with insulin glargine and insulin glulisine provide similar glycemic control as a physician-managed strategy? Results of the START (Self-Titration With Apidra to Reach Target) Study: a randomized noninferiority trial.患者自我管理的甘精胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素强化治疗方案与医生管理的方案相比,能否提供相似的血糖控制效果?APIDRA(赖脯胰岛素)起始治疗达到目标(START)研究结果:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):604-10. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1636. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of Physician-Led Versus Patient-Led Titration of Insulin Glargine in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of the Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS).医师主导与患者主导的甘精胰岛素滴定治疗在印度 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:亚洲甘精胰岛素治疗达标研究(ATLAS)的亚组分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Nov;21(11):656-664. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0037. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Randomized, open-label, parallel-group evaluations of basal-bolus therapy versus insulin lispro premixed therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve control with starter insulin treatment and continuing oral antihyperglycemic drugs: a noninferiority intensification substudy of the DURABLE trial.随机、开放标签、平行组评估:对于起始胰岛素治疗控制不佳且继续使用口服降糖药的 2 型糖尿病患者,基础-餐时胰岛素治疗与赖脯胰岛素预混治疗的疗效比较:DURABLE 试验的一项非劣效性强化亚研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):896-908. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.001.
4
Comparative effectiveness of basal-bolus versus premix analog insulin on glycemic variability and patient-centered outcomes during insulin intensification in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.基础-餐时胰岛素与预混人胰岛素类似物强化治疗 1 型和 2 型糖尿病时对血糖变异性和以患者为中心结局的比较效果:一项随机、对照、交叉试验。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Oct;97(10):3504-14. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1763. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
5
Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen, with insulin aspart as the mealtime insulin, in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 52-week, multinational, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target noninferiority trial.在基础-餐时胰岛素方案中,将门冬胰岛素作为餐时胰岛素,比较地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病患者的 52 周、多国、随机、开放标签、平行组、治疗达标非劣效性试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2086-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.006.
6
Titration of Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Asia: Physician- Versus Patient-Led? Rationale of the Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS).亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者甘精胰岛素滴定:医生主导还是患者主导?亚洲甘精胰岛素达标治疗研究(ATLAS)的理由。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Jan;13(1):67-72. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0170.
7
An exploratory trial of basal and prandial insulin initiation and titration for type 2 diabetes in primary care with adjunct retrospective continuous glucose monitoring: INITIATION study.一项在初级保健中启动和滴定基础胰岛素与餐时胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病并辅助回顾性持续血糖监测的探索性试验:INITIATION研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Nov;106(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
8
New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1).在使用基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者中,新的甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升的比较:6 个月随机对照试验中的血糖控制和低血糖(EDITION 1)。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2755-62. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0991. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
A 52-week, multinational, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen with mealtime insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes.一项为期52周的多国、开放标签、平行组、非劣效性、达标治疗试验,在2型糖尿病患者中,比较德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素在基础-餐时胰岛素方案中联合门冬胰岛素的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2008 Nov;30(11):1976-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.11.001.
10
Effects of initiation and titration of a single pre-prandial dose of insulin glulisine while continuing titrated insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a 6-month 'proof-of-concept' study.在继续滴定甘精胰岛素的同时,起始和滴定预餐前单次门冬胰岛素的效果:一项为期 6 个月的“概念验证”研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Nov;13(11):1020-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01459.x. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Oral Biomacromolecule Therapies for Metabolic Diseases.代谢性疾病口腔生物大分子疗法的进展
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 12;17(2):238. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020238.
2
Impact of Nurse-Led Titration Versus Physician Prescription of Hypoglycaemic Agents on HbA1c Level in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.护士主导的降糖药物滴定与医生处方对2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):e20436. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20436. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Insulin Initiation and Titration in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素起始治疗与滴定
Diabetes Spectr. 2019 May;32(2):104-111. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0005.
4
Take Control: A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of self- versus physician-managed titration of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.掌控自我:一项评价自我管理与医生管理甘精胰岛素 300U/mL 剂量调整对控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性的随机试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1615-1624. doi: 10.1111/dom.13697. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Management of Type 2 Diabetes - Methods for Addition of Prandial to Basal Insulin.2型糖尿病的管理——基础胰岛素联合餐时胰岛素的方法
Eur Endocrinol. 2014 Aug;10(2):124-130. doi: 10.17925/EE.2014.10.02.124. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
6
Effect of prandial treatment timing adjustment, based on continuous glucose monitoring, in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with once-daily basal insulin: A randomized, phase IV study.基于连续血糖监测的餐时治疗时间调整对每日一次基础胰岛素治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机、四期研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1186-1192. doi: 10.1111/dom.13214. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
7
Review of basal-plus insulin regimen options for simpler insulin intensification in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.回顾用于 2 型糖尿病患者简化胰岛素强化治疗的基础-餐时胰岛素方案选择。
Diabet Med. 2017 Sep;34(9):1193-1204. doi: 10.1111/dme.13390. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
8
Future challenges and therapeutic opportunities in type 2 diabetes: Changing the paradigm of current therapy.2 型糖尿病的未来挑战和治疗机遇:改变当前治疗模式。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Oct;19(10):1339-1352. doi: 10.1111/dom.12977. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Role of Emerging Insulin Technologies in the Initiation and Intensification of Insulin Therapy for Diabetes in Primary Care.新兴胰岛素技术在基层医疗中糖尿病胰岛素治疗起始及强化治疗中的作用
Clin Diabetes. 2016 Jan;34(1):34-43. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.34.1.34.
10
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: the EDIT randomized trial.在日本2型糖尿病患者中,西他列汀联合胰岛素治疗的疗效与安全性:EDIT随机试验
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121988. eCollection 2015.