Stallard P, Phillips R, Montgomery A A, Spears M, Anderson R, Taylor J, Araya R, Lewis G, Ukoumunne O C, Millings A, Georgiou L, Cook E, Sayal K
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Oct;17(47):vii-xvii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta17470.
Depression in adolescents is a significant problem that impairs everyday functioning and increases the risk of severe mental health disorders in adulthood. Although this is a major problem, relatively few adolescents with, or at risk of developing, depression are identified and referred for treatment. This suggests the need to investigate alternative approaches whereby preventative interventions are made widely available in schools.
To investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of classroom-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing symptoms of depression in high-risk adolescents.
Cluster randomised controlled trial. Year groups ( n = 28) randomly allocated on a 1 : 1 : 1 basis to one of three trial arms once all schools were recruited and balanced for number of classes, number of students, Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) lesson frequency, and scheduling of PSHE.
Year groups 8 to 11 (ages 12-16 years) in mixed-sex secondary schools in the UK. Data were collected between 2009 and 2011.
Young people who attended PSHE at participating schools were eligible ( n = 5503). Of the 5030 who agreed to participate, 1064 (21.2%) were classified as 'high risk': 392 in the classroom-based CBT arm, 374 in the attention control PSHE arm and 298 in the usual PSHE arm. Primary outcome data on the high-risk group at 12 months were available for classroom-based CBT ( n = 296), attention control PSHE ( n = 308) and usual PSHE ( n = 242).
The Resourceful Adolescent Programme (RAP) is a focused CBT-based intervention adapted for the UK (RAP-UK) and delivered by two facilitators external to the school. Control groups were usual PSHE (usual school curriculum delivered by teachers) and attention control (usual school PSHE with additional support from two facilitators). Interventions were delivered universally to whole classes.
Clinical effectiveness: symptoms of depression [Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)] in adolescents at high risk of depression 12 months from baseline. Cost-effectiveness: incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) based on SMFQ score and quality-adjusted life-years (from European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions scores) between baseline and 12 months. Process evaluation: reach, attrition and qualitative feedback from service recipients and providers.
SMFQ scores had decreased for high-risk adolescents in all trial arms at 12 months, but there was no difference between arms [classroom-based CBT vs. usual PSHE adjusted difference in means 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.34 to 2.28; classroom-based CBT vs. attention control PSHE -0.63, 95% CI -1.99 to 0.73]. Costs of interventions per child were estimated at £41.96 for classroom-based CBT and £34.45 for attention control PSHE. Fieller's method was used to obtain a parametric estimate of the 95% CI for the ICERs and construct the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, confirming that classroom-based CBT was not cost-effective relative to the controls. Reach of classroom-based CBT was good and attrition was low (median 80% attending ≥ 60% of sessions), but feedback indicated some difficulties with acceptability and sustainability.
Classroom-based CBT, attention control PSHE and usual PSHE produced similar outcomes. Classroom-based CBT may result in increased self-awareness and reporting of depressive symptoms. Classroom-based CBT was not shown to be cost-effective. While schools are a convenient way of reaching a wide range of young people, implementing classroom-based CBT within schools is challenging, particularly with regard to fitting programmes into a busy timetable, the lack of value placed on PSHE, and difficulties engaging with teachers and young people. Wider use of classroom-based depression prevention programmes should not be undertaken without further research. If universal preventative approaches are to be pursued, their clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness with younger children (aged 10-11 years), before the incidence of depression increases, should be investigated. Alternatively, the clinical effectiveness of indicated school-based programmes targeting those already displaying symptoms of depression should be investigated.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19083628.
This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 17, No. 47. See the HTA programme website for further project information.
青少年抑郁症是一个严重问题,会影响日常功能,并增加成年后患严重精神健康障碍的风险。尽管这是一个重大问题,但相对较少的患有抑郁症或有患抑郁症风险的青少年被识别出来并被转介接受治疗。这表明需要研究替代方法,以便在学校广泛提供预防性干预措施。
研究基于课堂的认知行为疗法(CBT)在减轻高危青少年抑郁症状方面的临床疗效和成本效益。
整群随机对照试验。一旦所有学校都被招募并在班级数量、学生人数、个人、社会和健康教育(PSHE)课程频率以及PSHE课程安排方面达到平衡,将年级组(n = 28)以1:1:1的比例随机分配到三个试验组之一。
英国男女混合中学的8至11年级(12 - 16岁)。数据收集于2009年至2011年期间。
在参与学校参加PSHE的年轻人符合条件(n = 5503)。在同意参与的5030人中,1064人(21.2%)被归类为“高危”:基于课堂的CBT组392人,注意力控制PSHE组374人,常规PSHE组298人。12个月时高危组的主要结局数据可用于基于课堂的CBT组(n = 296)、注意力控制PSHE组(n = 308)和常规PSHE组(n = 242)。
“足智多谋的青少年计划”(RAP)是一种针对英国改编的基于CBT的重点干预措施(RAP - UK),由学校外部的两名辅导员实施。对照组为常规PSHE(由教师提供常规学校课程)和注意力控制组(常规学校PSHE并得到两名辅导员的额外支持)。干预措施面向全班学生普遍实施。
临床疗效:从基线起12个月时高危青少年的抑郁症状[简短情绪与感受问卷(SMFQ)]。成本效益:基于SMFQ评分和基线至12个月期间的质量调整生命年(来自欧洲生活质量五维度评分)的增量成本效益比(ICER)。过程评估:服务接受者和提供者的覆盖范围、损耗率和定性反馈。
12个月时,所有试验组中高危青少年的SMFQ评分均有所下降,但各试验组之间无差异[基于课堂的CBT组与常规PSHE组调整后的均值差异为0.97,95%置信区间(CI)为 - 0.34至2.28;基于课堂的CBT组与注意力控制PSHE组为 - 0.63,95%CI为 - 1.99至0.73]。基于课堂的CBT每个儿童的干预成本估计为41.96英镑,注意力控制PSHE为34.45英镑。使用Fieller方法获得ICER的95%CI的参数估计值并构建成本效益可接受性曲线,证实基于课堂的CBT相对于对照组不具有成本效益。基于课堂的CBT覆盖范围良好,损耗率较低(中位数为80%参加≥60%的课程),但反馈表明在可接受性和可持续性方面存在一些困难。
基于课堂的CBT、注意力控制PSHE和常规PSHE产生了相似的结果。基于课堂的CBT可能会提高对抑郁症状的自我意识和报告率。基于课堂的CBT未显示具有成本效益。虽然学校是接触广泛青少年的便捷方式,但在学校实施基于课堂的CBT具有挑战性,特别是在将课程纳入繁忙的时间表、对PSHE缺乏重视以及与教师和青少年接触困难方面。在没有进一步研究的情况下,不应更广泛地使用基于课堂的抑郁症预防计划。如果要推行普遍的预防方法,应研究其对年幼儿童(10 - 11岁)在抑郁症发病率增加之前的临床疗效和成本效益。或者,应研究针对那些已经表现出抑郁症状的学生的校内针对性计划的临床疗效。
当前对照试验ISRCTN19083628。
该项目由英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估计划资助,将在《卫生技术评估》全文发表;第17卷,第47期。有关更多项目信息,请参阅HTA计划网站。