1Physical Education School, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; 2Physical Education School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; and 3Physical Education School, Midwest State University of Parana, Guarapuava, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jun;28(6):1679-87. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000304.
The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory responses of young women to exercise at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1), the second ventilatory threshold (VT2), and at maximum effort (MAX) between maximal incremental tests performed using water aerobic exercises and a treadmill on land (TL). Twenty women (24.0 ± 2.5 years; 163.3 ± 6.7 cm; 60.0 ± 6.7 kg) underwent 4 maximal tests in randomized order, with a 48-hour interval between tests. Three tests involved performing water aerobic exercises (stationary running, frontal kick, and cross-country skiing) and 1 TL. Oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation (VE), and heart rate were measured throughout the tests, and their values at the VT1, VT2, and MAX intensities were determined by 3 independent, experienced physiologists. Repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for comparisons between tests (α = 0.05). Heart rate was significantly higher in the TL condition compared with the water aerobic exercises at the VT1 (p = 0.001), VT2 (p < 0.001), and MAX (p < 0.001) intensities. VO2 and VE had similar values across the 4 protocols at the VT1 intensity, but significantly higher values were observed with TL (VO2: p < 0.001; VE: p < 0.001) at the VT2 intensity. At the MAX intensity, VO2 was significantly higher with TL compared with the 3 water aerobic exercises (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences in VE between the 4 protocols were found. These results suggest that the prescription of water aerobics classes should be based on specific maximal tests for water aerobic exercises. Training intensities could be overestimated if they were based on maximal tests on dry land.
本研究旨在比较在水中有氧运动和陆地跑步机(TL)的最大递增测试中,年轻女性在第一通气阈(VT1)、第二通气阈(VT2)和最大努力(MAX)时的心肺反应。20 名女性(24.0±2.5 岁;163.3±6.7cm;60.0±6.7kg)以随机顺序进行了 4 次最大测试,每次测试间隔 48 小时。三次测试涉及进行水中有氧运动(固定跑步、正面踢腿和越野滑雪)和一次 TL。在整个测试过程中测量了氧气摄取量(VO2)、通气量(VE)和心率,通过 3 名独立的、有经验的生理学家确定了在 VT1、VT2 和 MAX 强度时的 VO2 和 VE 值。采用重复测量方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验进行测试之间的比较(α=0.05)。TL 时的心率在 VT1(p=0.001)、VT2(p<0.001)和 MAX(p<0.001)强度时均显著高于水中有氧运动。在 VT1 强度时,4 种方案的 VO2 和 VE 值相似,但在 TL 时,VE 值显著升高(VO2:p<0.001;VE:p<0.001)。在 MAX 强度时,TL 时的 VO2 显著高于 3 种水中有氧运动(p<0.001),而 4 种方案之间的 VE 无显著差异。这些结果表明,水中有氧运动课程的处方应基于特定的水中有氧运动最大测试。如果基于陆地的最大测试,则训练强度可能会被高估。