Boyle Michael, Chukwu Joseph, Boyle Mary, Connolly Ann, Webb David
Department of Paediatric Neurology, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Incorporating the National Children's Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland,
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Apr;173(4):525-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2180-7. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
The objective of this study was to compare the first afebrile seizure management with internationally recognized standards in an Irish tertiary pediatric setting. Twenty-one management standards were derived from a combination of British (NICE 2004) and North American (AAN 2003) guidelines. Cases of first afebrile seizure presenting to a pediatric emergency department between July 2007 and June 2010 were assessed against the standards. On completion, the standards developed were presented to the relevant stakeholders, a nurse-developed parental advice sheet was introduced, and a re-audit was performed from July 2010 to June 2011. Forty children were identified in the initial audit period (A1) and 41 over the re-audit (A2). No case achieved full compliance with the devised standards in the audit period. A median compliance score of 15 (range 5-20) was achieved in A1 and 17 (range 11-21) in A2 [mean rank 31.93 versus 49.85; p(1,1) < 0.0001]. Optimal compliance (total score of ≥17) with devised standards was achieved in 6/40 patients in A1 and in 21/41 patients in A2 [χ (2) = 11.95; p(1,1) = 0.001].
We demonstrated an initial lack of compliance with international guidelines on management of a common medical presentation, first afebrile seizure, and demonstrated that improvements can be achieved by identification of appropriate standards and critical appraisal of the compliance with these standards through both formal and informal education.
本研究的目的是在爱尔兰一家三级儿科机构中将首次无热惊厥的管理与国际认可的标准进行比较。21项管理标准源自英国(2004年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所)和北美(2003年美国神经病学学会)指南的综合。对2007年7月至2010年6月期间到儿科急诊科就诊的首次无热惊厥病例依据这些标准进行评估。完成后,将制定的标准提交给相关利益相关者,引入了一份由护士编写的家长建议表,并于2010年7月至2011年6月进行了重新审核。在初始审核期(A1)确定了40名儿童,重新审核期(A2)确定了41名儿童。在审核期内没有病例完全符合制定的标准。A1期的中位合规评分为15分(范围5 - 20分),A2期为17分(范围11 - 21分)[平均秩次31.93对49.85;p(1,1) < 0.0001]。A1期40名患者中有6名达到了与制定标准的最佳合规(总分≥17分),A2期41名患者中有21名达到最佳合规[χ(2) = 11.95;p(1,1) = 0.001]。
我们证明了在常见医疗情况即首次无热惊厥的管理方面最初不符合国际指南,并表明通过确定适当的标准以及通过正式和非正式教育对这些标准的合规情况进行严格评估可以实现改进。