Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York, 622 W 168th St, PH 137, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):e1266-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1752. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
Variables used in prediction rules and clinical guidelines should show acceptable agreement when assessed by different observers. Our objective was to determine the interobserver agreement of patient history and physical examination variables used to assess children undergoing emergency department (ED) evaluation for a first seizure not provoked by a known precipitant such as fever or trauma (ie, an unprovoked seizure).
We conducted a prospective cohort study of children aged 28 days to 18 years evaluated for unprovoked seizures at 6 tertiary care EDs. We excluded patients if previously evaluated for a similar event. Two clinicians independently completed a clinical assessment before neuroimaging. We determined agreement for each clinical variable by using the unweighted κ statistic.
A total of 217 paired observations were analyzed; median patient age was 53.5 months, and 38% were younger than 2 years. Agreement beyond chance was at least moderate (κ ≥ 0.41) for 21 of 31 (68%) variables for which κ could be calculated. κ was ≥0.41 for 7 of 11 (64%) general history variables, all 8 seizure-specific history variables (including seizure focality), and 6 of 12 (50%) physical examination variables. Agreement beyond chance was substantial or better (κ ≥ 0.61) for 2 of 11 (18%) general history variables, for 5 of 8 (63%) seizure-specific history variables, and for 2 of 12 (17%) physical examination variables.
For children with first unprovoked seizures evaluated in the ED, clinicians frequently assess findings from seizure-specific history with substantial agreement beyond chance. Those clinical variables that have been associated with the presence of intracranial abnormalities and show reliability between assessors, such as seizure focality and the presence of any focal neurological finding, may be more useful in the ED assessment of children with first unprovoked seizures.
预测规则和临床指南中使用的变量在不同观察者评估时应表现出可接受的一致性。我们的目的是确定用于评估因未知诱因(如发热或创伤)而无诱因发作的急诊科(ED)就诊儿童病史和体检变量的观察者间一致性。
我们对在 6 家三级保健 ED 因无诱因发作而接受评估的 28 天至 18 岁儿童进行了前瞻性队列研究。如果患者之前因类似事件接受过评估,则将其排除在外。两名临床医生在神经影像学检查前分别独立完成临床评估。我们使用非加权κ统计量确定每个临床变量的一致性。
共分析了 217 对观察结果;患者中位年龄为 53.5 个月,38%的患者年龄小于 2 岁。至少有 21 个(68%)可计算 κ 的变量的一致性超过偶然水平(κ≥0.41)。11 个一般病史变量中的 7 个(64%)、8 个癫痫特异性病史变量(包括癫痫灶性)和 12 个体格检查变量中的 6 个(50%)的 κ 值均≥0.41。2 个(18%)一般病史变量、5 个(63%)癫痫特异性病史变量和 2 个(17%)体格检查变量的一致性超过偶然水平,且一致性较好或更好(κ≥0.61)。
对于在 ED 就诊的首次无诱因发作的儿童,临床医生通常会根据癫痫特异性病史进行评估,且一致性超过偶然水平。那些与颅内异常存在相关且评估者之间具有可靠性的临床变量,如癫痫灶性和任何局灶性神经学发现,在 ED 评估首次无诱因发作的儿童时可能更有用。