Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;43(12):920-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4656. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
Repeated-measures, within-subject crossover trial.
The primary objective was to assess the effect of the burst-duty-cycle parameters of medium-frequency alternating current on the maximum electrically induced torque of the quadriceps femoris. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the amount of discomfort tolerated and the maximum current amplitude delivered for each electrical-stimulation condition.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation used for muscle strengthening can improve functional performance. However, the electrical-stimulation parameters to achieve optimal outcomes are still unknown. Previous studies have demonstrated that the characteristics of the burst duty cycle of medium-frequency alternating current influence torque-generation levels and perception of sensory discomfort.
The maximum electrically induced torque was assessed with a medium-frequency alternating current, with a carrier frequency of 2500 Hz and a modulated frequency of 50 Hz. The current amplitude was gradually increased to the point of the participant's maximum tolerance level. The testing sequence for the 3 burst duty cycles (20%, 35%, and 50%) was performed in a randomized order.
Electrical stimulation using a 20% burst duty cycle produced an electrically induced torque greater than the 35% (P = .01) and 50% (P<.01) burst duty cycles, with no difference between the 35% and 50% burst duty cycles (P = .46). There was no difference in the amount of sensory discomfort produced by the 3 durations of burst duty cycles (P = .34). There was also no difference between the 3 conditions for the maximum current amplitude tolerated (P = .62).
The burst duty cycle of 20% of medium-frequency alternating current, compared to burst duty cycles of 35% and 50%, produced higher peak torque of the quadriceps femoris in professional soccer players. There was no difference in discomfort produced and current amplitude tolerated between the different burst-duty-cycle conditions.
重复测量、受试者内交叉试验。
主要目的是评估中频交流电流的爆发工作周期参数对股四头肌最大电诱发扭矩的影响。次要目的是评估每种电刺激条件下的舒适度耐受量和最大电流幅度。
用于肌肉强化的神经肌肉电刺激可以改善功能表现。然而,实现最佳效果的电刺激参数仍不清楚。先前的研究表明,中频交流电流的爆发工作周期特性会影响扭矩产生水平和感觉不适的感知。
使用中频交流电流评估最大电诱发扭矩,载波频率为 2500 Hz,调制频率为 50 Hz。电流幅度逐渐增加到参与者的最大耐受水平。以随机顺序进行 3 种爆发工作周期(20%、35%和 50%)的测试序列。
使用 20%爆发工作周期的电刺激产生的电诱发扭矩大于 35%(P=0.01)和 50%(P<.01)爆发工作周期,35%和 50%爆发工作周期之间没有差异(P=0.46)。3 种爆发工作周期持续时间产生的感觉不适量没有差异(P=0.34)。3 种条件下的最大电流幅度耐受量也没有差异(P=0.62)。
与 35%和 50%爆发工作周期相比,中频交流电流的 20%爆发工作周期在职业足球运动员中产生了更高的股四头肌峰值扭矩。在不同爆发工作周期条件下,产生的不适感和耐受的电流幅度没有差异。