Coghill D R, Seth S, Matthews K
Division of Neuroscience, Medical Research Institute,University of Dundee,Ninewells Hospital, Dundee,UK.
Psychol Med. 2014 Jul;44(9):1989-2001. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002547. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
Although attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with a broad range of deficits across various neuropsychological domains, most studies have assessed only a narrow range of neuropsychological functions. Direct cross-domain comparisons are rare, with almost all studies restricted to less than four domains. Therefore, the relationships between these various domains remain undefined. In addition, almost all studies included previously medicated participants, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. We present the first study to compare a large cohort of medication-naive boys with ADHD with healthy controls on a broad battery of neuropsychological tasks, assessing six key domains of neuropsychological functioning.
The neuropsychological functioning of 83 medication-naive boys with well-characterized ADHD (mean age 8.9 years) was compared with that of 66 typically developing (TYP) boys (mean age 9.0 years) on a broad battery of validated neuropsychological tasks.
Data reduction using complementary factor analysis (CFA) confirmed six distinct neuropsychological domains: working memory, inhibition, delay aversion, decision making, timing and response variability. Boys with ADHD performed less well across all six domains although, for each domain, only a minority of boys with ADHD had a deficit [effect size (% with deficit) ADHD versus TYP: working memory 0.95 (30.1), inhibition 0.61 (22.9), delay aversion 0.82 (36.1), decision making 0.55 (20.5), timing 0.71 (31.3), response variability 0.37 (18.1)].
The clinical syndrome of ADHD is neuropsychologically heterogeneous. These data highlight the complexity of the relationships between the different neuropsychological profiles associated with ADHD and the clinical symptoms and functional impairment.
尽管注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与广泛的神经心理学领域的多种缺陷有关,但大多数研究仅评估了有限范围的神经心理学功能。直接的跨领域比较很少见,几乎所有研究都局限于少于四个领域。因此,这些不同领域之间的关系仍不明确。此外,几乎所有研究都纳入了之前接受过药物治疗的参与者,这限制了所能得出的结论。我们开展了第一项研究,在一系列广泛的神经心理学任务中,将一大群未接受过药物治疗的ADHD男孩与健康对照进行比较,评估神经心理学功能的六个关键领域。
在一系列经过验证的神经心理学任务中,将83名具有明确特征的未接受过药物治疗的ADHD男孩(平均年龄8.9岁)的神经心理学功能与66名发育正常(TYP)的男孩(平均年龄9.0岁)进行比较。
使用互补因子分析(CFA)进行数据降维,确认了六个不同的神经心理学领域:工作记忆、抑制、延迟厌恶、决策、时间感知和反应变异性。ADHD男孩在所有六个领域的表现都较差,不过,对于每个领域,只有少数ADHD男孩存在缺陷[ADHD与TYP相比有缺陷的百分比效应量:工作记忆0.95(30.1),抑制0.61(22.9),延迟厌恶0.82(36.1),决策0.55(20.5),时间感知0.71(31.3),反应变异性0.37(18.1)]。
ADHD的临床综合征在神经心理学上是异质性的。这些数据凸显了与ADHD相关的不同神经心理学特征之间的关系以及临床症状和功能损害的复杂性。