Suppr超能文献

动静脉瘘用于血液透析的通畅率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Kidney Clinical Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):464-78. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advantages of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF), including long patency and few complications, were ascertained more than 2 decades ago and may not apply to the contemporary dialysis population.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model and sources of heterogeneity were explored using metaregression.

SETTING & POPULATION: Patients treated with long-term hemodialysis using an AVF.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

English-language studies indexed in MEDLINE between 2000 and 2012 using prospectively collected data on 100 or more AVFs.

PREDICTOR

Age, AVF location, and study location.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest were primary AVF failure and primary and secondary patency at 1 and 2 years.

RESULTS

7,011 citations were screened and 46 articles met eligibility criteria (62 unique cohorts; n = 12,383). The rate of primary failure was 23% (95% CI, 18%-28%; 37 cohorts; 7,393 AVFs). When primary failures were included, the primary patency rate was 60% (95% CI, 56%-64%; 13 studies; 21 cohorts; 4,111 AVFs) at 1 year and 51% (95% CI, 44%-58%; 7 studies; 12 cohorts; 2,694 AVFs) at 2 years. The secondary patency rate was 71% (95% CI, 64%-78%; 10 studies; 11 cohorts; 3,558 AVFs) at 1 year and 64% (95% CI, 56%-73%; 6 studies; 11 cohorts; 1,939 AVFs) at 2 years. In metaregression, there was a significant decrease in primary patency rate in studies that started recruitment in more recent years.

LIMITATIONS

Low quality of studies, variable clinical settings, and variable definitions of primary AVF failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, AVFs had a high rate of primary failure and low to moderate primary and secondary patency rates. Consideration of these outcomes is required when choosing a patient's preferred access type.

摘要

背景

动静脉瘘(AVF)的优势,包括长期通畅和并发症少,早在 20 多年前就已确定,但可能不适用于当代透析人群。

研究设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型汇总估计值,并使用荟萃回归探索异质性来源。

研究人群

接受长期血液透析治疗的患者,使用 AVF。

研究选择标准

2000 年至 2012 年期间在 MEDLINE 上发表的英语文献,使用前瞻性收集的 100 例或更多 AVF 数据。

预测因素

年龄、AVF 位置和研究地点。

研究结果

筛选了 7011 条引文,46 篇文章符合入选标准(62 个独特队列;n=12383)。主要 AVF 失败的发生率为 23%(95%CI,18%-28%;37 个队列;7393 个 AVF)。当包括主要失败时,1 年时的主要通畅率为 60%(95%CI,56%-64%;13 项研究;21 个队列;4111 个 AVF),2 年时为 51%(95%CI,44%-58%;7 项研究;12 个队列;2694 个 AVF)。2 年时的次级通畅率为 71%(95%CI,64%-78%;10 项研究;11 个队列;3558 个 AVF)。在荟萃回归中,在最近几年开始招募的研究中,主要通畅率显著下降。

局限性

研究质量低、临床环境不同、以及主要 AVF 失败的定义不同。

结论

近年来,AVF 的主要失败率较高,主要和次要通畅率较低或中等。在选择患者首选的血管通路类型时,需要考虑这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验