Desai Radhika, Durham Justin, Wassell Robert W, Preshaw Philip M
School of Dental Sciences, Centre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
School of Dental Sciences, Centre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Dent. 2014 Jan;42(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
To determine if there are differences in outcome scores if the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49) is delivered by two different modes of administration (manual-self complete versus telephone interview).
Patients with chronic periodontitis (n=83, 54% females and 46% males, mean age 49.1±9.5 years) completed the OHIP-49 using two modes of administration (manual self-complete and telephone interview) in a randomly assigned order, with a minimum washout period of 2 weeks between modes, both episodes occurring prior to any periodontal treatment being provided. To assess convergent validity, after each mode of administration, the patients were additionally asked a global question about their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).
Median OHIP-49 scores recorded by manual self-complete (median 36 [IQR=20-70]) were significantly higher than those recorded by telephone interview (median 27 [IQR=11-61]) (p<0.01). The global question was well correlated to the OHIP domains, but did not reveal any evidence of an order effect such as was seen with OHIP-49 itself (which showed a higher impact on OHRQoL during the first administration in either mode).
The mode of administration (manual-self complete versus telephone interview) did substantially influence the OHIP-49 scores in patients with chronic periodontitis. The OHRQoL differed between the two modes of administration, with significantly higher scores (indicating poorer OHRQoL) when the questionnaire was manually self-completed.
The mode of administration of quality of life questionnaires such as OHIP-49 could potentially affect the outcome scores derived. This study investigated whether there is a difference in outcome scores if OHIP-49 is delivered via manual self-complete or by telephone interview in patients with chronic periodontitis. We found that there was a significant difference between the two modes: manual self-completion by the patients yielded significantly higher scores than completion by telephone interview. It is therefore important to be consistent in the mode of completion of OHIP-49, as mixing modes could introduce additional error into clinical studies that utilise this instrument.
确定采用两种不同施测方式(手动自我完成与电话访谈)进行口腔健康影响程度量表-49(OHIP-49)测评时,结果得分是否存在差异。
慢性牙周炎患者(n = 83,女性占54%,男性占46%,平均年龄49.1±9.5岁)按照随机分配的顺序,采用两种施测方式(手动自我完成和电话访谈)完成OHIP-49测评,两种方式之间的最短洗脱期为2周,且两次测评均在进行任何牙周治疗之前。为评估聚合效度,在每种施测方式之后,额外询问患者一个关于其口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的总体问题。
手动自我完成方式记录的OHIP-49中位数得分(中位数36 [四分位间距=20 - 70])显著高于电话访谈记录的得分(中位数27 [四分位间距=11 - 61])(p < 0.01)。总体问题与OHIP各领域相关性良好,但未显示出任何顺序效应的证据,而OHIP-49本身存在这种效应(在任何一种方式的首次施测期间,对OHRQoL的影响更大)。
施测方式(手动自我完成与电话访谈)对慢性牙周炎患者的OHIP-49得分有显著影响。两种施测方式下的OHRQoL存在差异,当问卷通过手动自我完成时得分显著更高(表明OHRQoL更差)。
诸如OHIP-49之类的生活质量问卷的施测方式可能会影响所得到的结果得分。本研究调查了在慢性牙周炎患者中,通过手动自我完成或电话访谈进行OHIP-49测评时,结果得分是否存在差异。我们发现两种方式之间存在显著差异:患者手动自我完成的得分显著高于电话访谈完成的得分。因此,在完成OHIP-49的方式上保持一致很重要,因为混合方式可能会给使用该工具的临床研究引入额外误差。