Suppr超能文献

《口腔健康影响程度量表-49》的施测方式会影响结果得分吗?

Does the mode of administration of the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 affect the outcome score?

作者信息

Desai Radhika, Durham Justin, Wassell Robert W, Preshaw Philip M

机构信息

School of Dental Sciences, Centre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

School of Dental Sciences, Centre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Dent. 2014 Jan;42(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are differences in outcome scores if the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49) is delivered by two different modes of administration (manual-self complete versus telephone interview).

METHODS

Patients with chronic periodontitis (n=83, 54% females and 46% males, mean age 49.1±9.5 years) completed the OHIP-49 using two modes of administration (manual self-complete and telephone interview) in a randomly assigned order, with a minimum washout period of 2 weeks between modes, both episodes occurring prior to any periodontal treatment being provided. To assess convergent validity, after each mode of administration, the patients were additionally asked a global question about their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).

RESULTS

Median OHIP-49 scores recorded by manual self-complete (median 36 [IQR=20-70]) were significantly higher than those recorded by telephone interview (median 27 [IQR=11-61]) (p<0.01). The global question was well correlated to the OHIP domains, but did not reveal any evidence of an order effect such as was seen with OHIP-49 itself (which showed a higher impact on OHRQoL during the first administration in either mode).

CONCLUSIONS

The mode of administration (manual-self complete versus telephone interview) did substantially influence the OHIP-49 scores in patients with chronic periodontitis. The OHRQoL differed between the two modes of administration, with significantly higher scores (indicating poorer OHRQoL) when the questionnaire was manually self-completed.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The mode of administration of quality of life questionnaires such as OHIP-49 could potentially affect the outcome scores derived. This study investigated whether there is a difference in outcome scores if OHIP-49 is delivered via manual self-complete or by telephone interview in patients with chronic periodontitis. We found that there was a significant difference between the two modes: manual self-completion by the patients yielded significantly higher scores than completion by telephone interview. It is therefore important to be consistent in the mode of completion of OHIP-49, as mixing modes could introduce additional error into clinical studies that utilise this instrument.

摘要

目的

确定采用两种不同施测方式(手动自我完成与电话访谈)进行口腔健康影响程度量表-49(OHIP-49)测评时,结果得分是否存在差异。

方法

慢性牙周炎患者(n = 83,女性占54%,男性占46%,平均年龄49.1±9.5岁)按照随机分配的顺序,采用两种施测方式(手动自我完成和电话访谈)完成OHIP-49测评,两种方式之间的最短洗脱期为2周,且两次测评均在进行任何牙周治疗之前。为评估聚合效度,在每种施测方式之后,额外询问患者一个关于其口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的总体问题。

结果

手动自我完成方式记录的OHIP-49中位数得分(中位数36 [四分位间距=20 - 70])显著高于电话访谈记录的得分(中位数27 [四分位间距=11 - 61])(p < 0.01)。总体问题与OHIP各领域相关性良好,但未显示出任何顺序效应的证据,而OHIP-49本身存在这种效应(在任何一种方式的首次施测期间,对OHRQoL的影响更大)。

结论

施测方式(手动自我完成与电话访谈)对慢性牙周炎患者的OHIP-49得分有显著影响。两种施测方式下的OHRQoL存在差异,当问卷通过手动自我完成时得分显著更高(表明OHRQoL更差)。

临床意义

诸如OHIP-49之类的生活质量问卷的施测方式可能会影响所得到的结果得分。本研究调查了在慢性牙周炎患者中,通过手动自我完成或电话访谈进行OHIP-49测评时,结果得分是否存在差异。我们发现两种方式之间存在显著差异:患者手动自我完成的得分显著高于电话访谈完成的得分。因此,在完成OHIP-49的方式上保持一致很重要,因为混合方式可能会给使用该工具的临床研究引入额外误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验