Adogwa Owoicho, Huang Mary I, Thompson Paul M, Darlington Timothy, Cheng Joseph S, Gokaslan Ziya L, Gottfried Oren N, Bagley Carlos A, Anderson Greg D, Isaacs Robert E
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, 1000 Trent Drive, Room 4517 Busse Bldg, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, 1000 Trent Drive, Room 4517 Busse Bldg, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1828-34. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
Incidental durotomies occur in up to 17% of spinal operations. Controversy exists regarding the short- and long-term consequences of durotomies.
The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of incidental durotomies on the immediate postoperative complications and patient-reported outcome measures.
Prospective study.
A total of 1,741 patients undergoing index lumbar spine fusion were selected from a multi-institutional prospective data registry.
Patient-reported outcome measures used in this study included back pain (BP-Visual Analog Scale), leg pain (LP-Visual Analog Scale), and Oswestry Disability Index.
A total of 1,741 patients were selected from a multi-institutional prospective data registry, who underwent primary lumbar fusion for low back pain and/or radiculopathy between January 2003 and December 2010. We collected and analyzed data on patient demographics, postoperative complications, back pain, leg pain, and functional disability over 2 years, with risk-adjusted propensity score modeling.
Incidental durotomies occurred in 70 patients (4%). Compared with the control group (n=1,671), there was no significant difference in postoperative infection (p=.32), need for reoperation (p=.85), or symptomatic neurologic damage (p=.66). At 1- and 2-year follow-up, there was no difference in patient-reported outcomes of back pain (BP-Visual Analog Scale), leg pain (LP-Visual Analog Scale), or functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index) (p>.3), with results remaining consistent in the propensity-matched cohort analysis (p>.4).
Within the context of an on-going debate on the consequences of incidental durotomy, we found no difference in neurologic symptoms, infection, reoperation, back pain, leg pain, or functional disability over a 2-year follow-up period.
在高达17%的脊柱手术中会发生意外硬脊膜切开。关于硬脊膜切开的短期和长期后果存在争议。
本研究的主要目的是评估意外硬脊膜切开对术后即刻并发症以及患者报告的结局指标的影响。
前瞻性研究。
从一个多机构前瞻性数据登记处选取了总共1741例行初次腰椎融合术的患者。
本研究中使用的患者报告结局指标包括背痛(BP -视觉模拟评分)、腿痛(LP -视觉模拟评分)和奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数。
从一个多机构前瞻性数据登记处选取了总共1741例患者,这些患者在2003年1月至2010年12月期间因腰痛和/或神经根病接受初次腰椎融合术。我们收集并分析了患者人口统计学、术后并发症、背痛、腿痛和功能障碍超过2年的数据,并采用风险调整倾向评分模型。
70例患者(4%)发生意外硬脊膜切开。与对照组(n = 1671)相比,术后感染(p = 0.32)、再次手术需求(p = 0.85)或有症状的神经损伤(p = 0.66)方面无显著差异。在1年和2年随访时,患者报告的背痛(BP -视觉模拟评分)、腿痛(LP -视觉模拟评分)或功能障碍(奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数)结局无差异(p > 0.3),在倾向匹配队列分析中结果保持一致(p > 0.4)。
在关于意外硬脊膜切开后果的持续争论背景下,我们发现在2年随访期内神经症状、感染、再次手术、背痛、腿痛或功能障碍方面无差异。