Pringle Yolana
Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Oxford, 45-7 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PE, UK.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):105-36. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrt055. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
In the early 1960s, medical officers and administrators began to receive reports of what was being described as "mass madness" and "mass hysteria" in Tanganyika (now Tanzania) and Uganda. Each epidemic reportedly affected between three hundred and six hundred people and, coming in the wake of independence from colonial rule, caused considerable concern. One of the practitioners sent to investigate was Benjamin H. Kagwa, a Ugandan-born psychiatrist whose report represents the first investigation by an African psychiatrist in East Africa. This article uses Kagwa's investigation to explore some of the difficulties facing East Africa's first generation of psychiatrists as they took over responsibility for psychiatry. During this period, psychiatrists worked in an intellectual climate that was both attempting to deal with the legacy of colonial racism, and which placed faith in African psychiatrists to reveal more culturally sensitive insights into African psychopathology. The epidemics were the first major challenge for psychiatrists such as Kagwa precisely because they appeared to confirm what colonial psychiatrists had been warning for years-that westernization would eventually result in mass mental instability. As this article argues, however, Kagwa was never fully able to free himself from the practices and assumptions that had pervaded his discipline under colonial rule. His analysis of the epidemics as a "mental conflict" fit into a much longer tradition of psychiatry in East Africa, and stood starkly against the explanations of the local community.
20世纪60年代初,医疗官员和管理人员开始收到关于坦噶尼喀(现坦桑尼亚)和乌干达出现所谓“群体疯狂”和“群体癔症”的报告。据报道,每次疫情影响了三百到六百人,且在摆脱殖民统治独立之后出现,引起了相当大的关注。被派去调查的从业者之一是本杰明·H·卡瓜,一位出生于乌干达的精神病学家,他的报告代表了东非第一位非洲精神病学家的首次调查。本文利用卡瓜的调查来探讨东非第一代精神病学家在接手精神病学职责时所面临的一些困难。在此期间,精神病学家工作的学术氛围既试图应对殖民种族主义的遗留问题,又寄希望于非洲精神病学家能对非洲精神病理学揭示出更具文化敏感性的见解。这些疫情对像卡瓜这样的精神病学家来说是第一个重大挑战,恰恰是因为它们似乎证实了殖民精神病学家多年来一直警告的事情——西方化最终会导致大规模的精神不稳定。然而,正如本文所论证的,卡瓜从未完全摆脱在殖民统治下弥漫于其学科的实践和假设。他将疫情分析为“精神冲突”,这符合东非精神病学更悠久的传统,并且与当地社区的解释形成鲜明对比。