Pringle Yolana
Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (CRASSH), University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.
J Imp Commonw Hist. 2016 Mar 3;44(2):241-262. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2015.1123975. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
This article uses a case-study approach to examine the complex and contradictory nature of diagnoses like neurasthenia in colonial Africa. Drawing on the case notes of European and African patients diagnosed with neurasthenia at the Church Missionary Society's Mengo Hospital, Uganda, it argues that in practice, and outside the colonial asylum in particular, ideas about race and mental illness were more nuanced than histories of psychiatry and empire might imply. At Mengo, the tales of pain and suffering recorded by the doctors remind us that there is more to the history of neurasthenia than colonial anxieties and socio-political control. This was a diagnosis that was negotiated in hospital examination rooms as much as in medical journals. Significantly, it was also a diagnosis that was not always reserved exclusively for white colonisers-at Mengo Hospital from the early 1900s neurasthenia was diagnosed in African patients too. It became part of a wider discussion about detribalisation, in which a person's social environment was as important as race.
本文采用案例研究方法,审视殖民时期非洲神经衰弱等诊断的复杂矛盾本质。借助乌干达丘奇传教士协会门戈医院诊断为神经衰弱的欧洲和非洲患者的病历,本文认为,实际上,尤其是在殖民庇护所之外,关于种族与精神疾病的观念比精神病学和帝国历史所暗示的更为细微。在门戈医院,医生记录的痛苦与苦难故事提醒我们,神经衰弱的历史不仅仅是殖民焦虑和社会政治控制。这一诊断在医院检查室和医学期刊中都经过了商讨。值得注意的是,这一诊断并不总是只针对白人殖民者——20世纪初以来,门戈医院也诊断出非洲患者患有神经衰弱。它成为了关于部落解体更广泛讨论的一部分,在这一讨论中,一个人的社会环境与种族同样重要。