Zieliński Rafał, Respondek-Liberska Maria
Klinika Otolaryngologii, Audiologii i Foniatri Dzieciecej UM w Łodzi, Polska.
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Sep;84(9):801-6. doi: 10.17772/gp/1643.
Fetal face is the key anatomical location, both psychologically and clinically for the mother and the clinician. Ultrasound prenatal examination of the maxillofacial region allows to evaluate the fetal face in the first weeks of gestation. In ambulatory intravaginal ultrasound, sensitivity of the facial defect detection is 20-30% in cases without the risk of TORCH and fetal abnormalities, which may arouse suspicion of the presence of facial malformation. Facial defects form a wide group of pathologies. Unfortunately challenges connected with 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging cause frequent misdiagnoses in early gestation. Maxillofacial abnormalities can be solitary or they can coexist with other abnormalities or syndromes. In case of detecting a facial defect, a precise and thorough ultrasound of whole fetal body is necessary whereas in case of detecting any fetal body abnormality a precise and thorough ultrasound examination of the fetal face is obligatory Unfortunately most contemporary prenatal ultrasound standards propose only the overall "face and orbits" evaluation of the fetal face. The evaluation is difficult at 23 and 24 weeks of gestation and seems to be rather challenging in the third trimester of gestation. Not only facial malformations but also facial dimorphic features may lead to the suspicion of genetic syndrome and they may be extremely important in making correct diagnosis. Attempts at standardization in fetal face ultrasound evaluation have proved to be extremely difficult. Advantages of 2D ultrasound over 3D ultrasound and 3D ultrasound over 2D ultrasound in fetal face evaluation have been a topic of much debate. Most typically fetal face is examined with 2D ultrasound in a few basic planes: coronary sagittal, frontal and oblique. The planes preferred in the evaluation of facial structures are discussed in details in the paper Fetal facial defects evaluated in the ultrasound examination may be divided into a few main groups: examination of the orbit and eyeball defects, examination of the external nose and nasal cavity defects, examination of the cleft defects involving the lip, hard and soft palate which may be unilateral or bilateral, examination of external ear defects, examination of mandibular defects and detection of fetal tumors. 3D ultrasound evaluation of the fetal face is extremely useful in visualization of the face, thus presenting a problem to parents and clinicians. Prenatal ultrasound examination provides necessary and extremely useful data concerning fetal facial abnormalities, which allows to plan care and further treatment including interventions in pediatric ENT, pediatric surgery and plastic surgery areas. Cooperation of ultrasound diagnostician and clinicians taking care of a child in the future is therefore necessary when designing treatment scheme in cases of fetal facial defects.
胎儿面部在心理和临床方面,对母亲和临床医生来说都是关键的解剖部位。超声产前检查颌面区域可在妊娠早期评估胎儿面部。在门诊经阴道超声检查中,对于无TORCH感染风险和胎儿异常的情况,面部缺陷检测的敏感性为20% - 30%,这可能会引发对面部畸形存在的怀疑。面部缺陷构成了一大类病理情况。不幸的是,与二维和三维超声成像相关的挑战导致在妊娠早期频繁出现误诊。颌面异常可以是孤立的,也可以与其他异常或综合征并存。如果检测到面部缺陷,需要对胎儿全身进行精确而全面的超声检查;而如果检测到胎儿身体的任何异常,则必须对胎儿面部进行精确而全面的超声检查。不幸的是,大多数当代产前超声标准仅提出对胎儿面部进行整体的“面部和眼眶”评估。在妊娠23周和24周时评估较为困难,在妊娠晚期似乎更具挑战性。不仅面部畸形,而且面部二态特征也可能引发对遗传综合征的怀疑,它们在做出正确诊断方面可能极其重要。胎儿面部超声评估的标准化尝试已被证明极其困难。在胎儿面部评估中,二维超声相对于三维超声的优势以及三维超声相对于二维超声的优势一直是诸多争论的话题。最常见的是用二维超声在几个基本平面检查胎儿面部:冠状矢状面、额面和斜面。本文详细讨论了评估面部结构时首选的平面。超声检查中评估的胎儿面部缺陷可分为几个主要类别:眼眶和眼球缺陷检查、外鼻和鼻腔缺陷检查、涉及唇、硬腭和软腭的腭裂缺陷检查(可能是单侧或双侧)、外耳缺陷检查、下颌缺陷检查以及胎儿肿瘤检测。三维超声评估胎儿面部在面部可视化方面极其有用,从而给父母和临床医生带来问题。产前超声检查提供了有关胎儿面部异常的必要且极其有用的数据,这有助于规划护理和进一步治疗,包括儿科耳鼻喉科、儿科外科和整形外科领域的干预措施。因此,在设计胎儿面部缺陷病例的治疗方案时,超声诊断医生与未来照顾孩子的临床医生之间的合作是必要的。