Suppr超能文献

非心脏手术围术期心肌梗死的预测:美国心脏病学会国家心血管数据注册中心报告。 你提供的原文翻译后与你给的译文不一致,我按照正确的翻译如下: 接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,较低的医院手术量与较高的院内死亡率相关:美国国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。

Lower hospital volume is associated with higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: A report from the NCDR.

作者信息

Kontos Michael C, Wang Yongfei, Chaudhry Sarwat I, Vetrovec George W, Curtis Jeptha, Messenger John

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):659-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000233. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend >36 primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) per hospital per year. Whether these standards remain valid when routine coronary stenting and newer pharmacological agents are used is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed patients who underwent primary PCI from July 2006 through June 2009 included in the CathPCI Registry. Hospitals were separated into 3 groups: low (≤36 primary PCIs/y, current guideline recommendation), intermediate (>36-60 primary PCIs/y), and high volume (>60 primary PCIs/y). In-hospital mortality and door-to-balloon time were examined for each group. A total of 87 324 patient visits for 86 044 patients from 738 hospitals were included. There were 278 low- (38%), 236 (32%) intermediate-, and 224 (30%) high-volume hospitals. The majority of patients with primary PCI (54%) were treated at high-volume hospitals, with 15% at low-volume hospitals. Unadjusted mortality was significantly higher in low-volume hospitals compared with high-volume hospitals (5.6% versus 4.8%; P<0.001), which was maintained after multivariate adjustment (1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.33; P=0.001). In contrast, mortality was not significantly different between intermediate-volume and high-volume hospitals (4.8% versus 4.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.11; P=0.61). Door-to-balloon times were significantly shorter in high-volume hospitals compared with low-volume hospitals (median, 72 minutes; interquartile range, [53-91] versus 77 [57-100] minutes; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher annual hospital volume of primary PCI continues to be associated with lower mortality, with higher mortality in hospitals performing ≤36 primary PCIs/y.

摘要

背景

当前指南建议每家医院每年进行超过36例的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。当使用常规冠状动脉支架置入术和更新的药物时,这些标准是否仍然有效尚不清楚。

方法与结果

我们分析了2006年7月至2009年6月期间纳入CathPCI注册研究的接受直接PCI的患者。医院被分为3组:低量组(≤36例直接PCI/年,当前指南推荐)、中等量组(>36 - 60例直接PCI/年)和高量组(>60例直接PCI/年)。对每组的院内死亡率和门球时间进行了检查。共纳入了来自738家医院的86044例患者的87324次就诊。有278家低量医院(38%)、236家(32%)中等量医院和224家(30%)高量医院。大多数接受直接PCI的患者(54%)在高量医院接受治疗,15%在低量医院接受治疗。低量医院的未调整死亡率显著高于高量医院(5.6%对4.8%;P<0.001),多变量调整后仍保持这一差异(1.20;95%置信区间,1.08 - 1.33;P = 0.001)。相比之下,中等量医院和高量医院之间的死亡率无显著差异(4.8%对4.8%;调整后的优势比,1.02;95%置信区间,0.94 - 1.11;P = 0.61)。高量医院的门球时间显著短于低量医院(中位数,72分钟;四分位间距,[53 - 91]对77 [57 - 100]分钟;P<0.0001)。

结论

每年医院直接PCI量较高仍与较低死亡率相关,每年进行≤36例直接PCI的医院死亡率较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验