Suppr超能文献

鉴定脑膜炎奈瑟菌携带者的方法:非洲脑膜炎带的一项多中心研究

Methods for identifying Neisseria meningitidis carriers: a multi-center study in the African meningitis belt.

作者信息

Basta Nicole E, Stuart James M, Nascimento Maria C, Manigart Olivier, Trotter Caroline, Hassan-King Musa, Chandramohan Daniel, Sow Samba O, Berthe Abdoulaye, Bedru Ahmed, Tekletsion Yenenesh K, Collard Jean-Marc, Jusot Jean-François, Diallo Aldiouma, Basséne Hubert, Daugla Doumagoum M, Gamougam Khadidja, Hodgson Abraham, Forgor Abudulai A, Omotara Babatunji A, Gadzama Galadima B, Watkins Eleanor R, Rebbetts Lisa S, Diallo Kanny, Weiss Noel S, Halloran M Elizabeth, Maiden Martin C J, Greenwood Brian

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America ; Research and Policy for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America ; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e78336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078336. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Detection of meningococcal carriers is key to understanding the epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis, yet no gold standard has been established. Here, we directly compare two methods for collecting pharyngeal swabs to identify meningococcal carriers.

METHODS

We conducted cross-sectional surveys of schoolchildren at multiple sites in Africa to compare swabbing the posterior pharynx behind the uvula (U) to swabbing the posterior pharynx behind the uvula plus one tonsil (T). Swabs were cultured immediately and analyzed using molecular methods.

RESULTS

One thousand and six paired swab samples collected from schoolchildren in four countries were analyzed. Prevalence of meningococcal carriage was 6.9% (95% CI: 5.4-8.6%) based on the results from both swabs, but the observed prevalence was lower based on one swab type alone. Prevalence based on the T swab or the U swab alone was similar (5.2% (95% CI: 3.8-6.7%) versus 4.9% (95% CI: 3.6-6.4%) respectively (p=0.6)). The concordance between the two methods was 96.3% and the kappa was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.73), indicating good agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

These two commonly used methods for collecting pharyngeal swabs provide consistent estimates of the prevalence of carriage, but both methods misclassified carriers to some degree, leading to underestimates of the prevalence.

摘要

目的

检测脑膜炎球菌携带者是了解脑膜炎奈瑟菌流行病学的关键,但尚未建立金标准。在此,我们直接比较两种采集咽拭子的方法以识别脑膜炎球菌携带者。

方法

我们在非洲多个地点对学童进行横断面调查,比较在悬雍垂后方擦拭咽后部(U)与在悬雍垂后方加一个扁桃体处擦拭咽后部(T)的方法。拭子立即进行培养并采用分子方法分析。

结果

对从四个国家的学童收集的1006对拭子样本进行了分析。基于两种拭子的结果,脑膜炎球菌携带率为6.9%(95%置信区间:5.4 - 8.6%),但仅基于一种拭子类型观察到的携带率较低。仅基于T拭子或U拭子的携带率相似(分别为5.2%(95%置信区间:3.8 - 6.7%)和4.9%(95%置信区间:3.6 - 6.4%)(p = 0.6))。两种方法之间的一致性为96.3%,kappa值为0.61(95%置信区间:0.50 - 0.73),表明一致性良好。

结论

这两种常用的采集咽拭子的方法对携带率的估计结果一致,但两种方法在一定程度上都将携带者误分类,导致对携带率的低估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b45/3806823/46fc9f397426/pone.0078336.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验