• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[急诊医疗现场分诊的可靠性:以交通事故受害者为例]

[Reliability of emergency medical field triage : Exemplified by traffic accident victims].

作者信息

Helm M, Faul M, Unger T, Lampl L

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin - Sektion Notfallmedizin/Luftrettungszentrum "Christoph 22", Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland,

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2255-x. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-013-2255-x
PMID:24196404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of death in the patient group under 40 years of age. Within the prehospital management of seriously injured trauma victims the accuracy of the field triage by emergency physicians is of utmost importance.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of prehospital emergency physician field triage in road traffic accident victims.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved a retrospective analysis and comparison of prehospital and inhospital trauma records of road traffic accident victims treated by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) team and transferred to a level I trauma centre. A comparison of prehospital and inhospital diagnostic findings was carried out according to an anatomical score (AIS).

RESULTS

Included in the analysis were 479 patients with a mean age of 37.0 ± 18.2 years, males 65.8 %, mean injury severity score (ISS) 15.5 ± 13.5, ISS > 16 in 41,1 % and mortality 7.3 %. The leading causes of injury were motor vehicle accidents (56.2 %), followed by motorcycle (24.0 %) and bicycle accidents (11.6 %) as well as truck accidents (4.0 %) and pedestrian accidents (4.2 %). The most common body regions injured (AIS ≥ 3) were the chest (37 %), head (25.1 %) and lower extremities (16.7 %). A correct prehospital field triage by emergency physicians was found for injuries with an AIS ≥ 3 of the head 77 %, chest 69 %, abdomen 51 %, pelvis 49 %, extremities 70 %, neck/cervical spine 67 % and thoracic/lumbar spine 70 %. Overlooked injuries in the prehospital setting (AIS ≥ 3) comprised predominantly injuries of the trunk (chest 12.6 %, abdomen 16.9 % and pelvis 15 %). Overlooked injuries were found significantly less for the head in patients with a Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8 on arrival at the scene (5.4 % versus 19 %, p = 0.015), for the chest in patients with a S(p)O(2) ≤ 96 % on arrival at the scene (18.1 % versus 35.5 %, p = 0.004) and for the abdomen in patients with a systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg on arrival at the scene (28.6 % versus 52.5 %, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Accurate field triage in seriously injured road accident victims, even by trained physicians, is difficult. This pertains especially to injuries to the abdomen and the pelvis. For the field triage a combination of anatomical and physiological criteria as well as the mechanism of injury should be used to increase accuracy.

摘要

背景

创伤是40岁以下患者群体的主要死因。在重伤创伤受害者的院前管理中,急诊医生进行现场分诊的准确性至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在确定院前急诊医生对道路交通事故受害者进行现场分诊的准确性。

材料与方法

本研究对直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)团队救治并转至一级创伤中心的道路交通事故受害者的院前和院内创伤记录进行回顾性分析和比较。根据解剖学评分(AIS)对院前和院内诊断结果进行比较。

结果

纳入分析的患者有479例,平均年龄37.0±18.2岁,男性占65.8%,平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为15.5±13.5,ISS>16的患者占41.1%,死亡率为7.3%。受伤的主要原因是机动车事故(56.2%),其次是摩托车事故(24.0%)、自行车事故(11.6%)、卡车事故(4.0%)和行人事故(4.2%)。受伤最常见的身体部位(AIS≥3)是胸部(37%)、头部(25.1%)和下肢(16.7%)。急诊医生对头部AIS≥3的损伤进行正确院前现场分诊的比例为77%,胸部为69%,腹部为51%,骨盆为49%,四肢为70%,颈部/颈椎为67%,胸腰椎为70%。院前漏诊的损伤(AIS≥3)主要是躯干损伤(胸部12.6%、腹部16.9%和骨盆15%)。到达现场时格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8分的患者头部漏诊损伤明显较少(5.4%对19%,p=0.015),到达现场时血氧饱和度(S(p)O(2))≤96%的患者胸部漏诊损伤明显较少(18.1%对35.5%,p=0.004),到达现场时收缩压<90 mmHg的患者腹部漏诊损伤明显较少(28.6%对52.5%,p=0.025)。

结论

即使是训练有素的医生,对重伤道路事故受害者进行准确的现场分诊也很困难。这尤其适用于腹部和骨盆损伤。对于现场分诊,应结合解剖学和生理学标准以及损伤机制来提高准确性。

相似文献

1
[Reliability of emergency medical field triage : Exemplified by traffic accident victims].[急诊医疗现场分诊的可靠性:以交通事故受害者为例]
Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2255-x. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
2
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
[Prehospital assessment of injury type and severity in severely injured patients by emergency physicians : An analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®].[急诊医师对重伤患者院前损伤类型和严重程度的评估:创伤注册数据库DGU®分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2017 May;120(5):409-416. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0127-3.
4
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Prehospital triage in the injured pediatric patient.受伤儿童患者的院前分诊
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Jan;35(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)80019-6.
6
Accuracy of prehospital diagnosis and triage of a Swiss helicopter emergency medical service.瑞士直升机紧急医疗服务院前诊断和分诊的准确性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):709-15. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825c14b7.
7
Road Traffic Injury in Lagos, Nigeria: Assessing Prehospital Care.尼日利亚拉各斯的道路交通伤害:评估院前护理。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):424-430. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006410. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
Severity and injury characteristics among matched hospitalized motorcycle drivers and their passengers.匹配的住院摩托车驾驶员及其乘客的严重程度和损伤特征。
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Aug;22(4):223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.08.007. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
[Preclinical prediction of prehospital injury severity by emergency physicians : approach to evaluate validity].急诊医师对院前损伤严重程度的临床前预测:评估有效性的方法
Anaesthesist. 2011 Jun;60(6):534-40. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1846-z. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
10
[Correlation between survival time and severity of injuries in fatal injuries in traffic accidents].[交通事故致命伤中生存时间与损伤严重程度的相关性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001 Nov-Dec;129(11-12):291-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy between prehospital and hospital diagnosis in helicopter emergency medical services and its consequences for trauma care.直升机紧急医疗服务中院前和院内诊断的准确性及其对创伤救治的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1681-1690. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02505-y. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Epidemiology and predictors of traumatic spine injury in severely injured patients: implications for emergency procedures.严重创伤患者创伤性脊柱损伤的流行病学和预测因素:对急诊程序的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):1975-1983. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01515-w. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Quality measurement in physician-staffed emergency medical services: a systematic literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
[Preclinical prediction of prehospital injury severity by emergency physicians : approach to evaluate validity].急诊医师对院前损伤严重程度的临床前预测:评估有效性的方法
Anaesthesist. 2011 Jun;60(6):534-40. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1846-z. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
2
[Injury severity and pattern at the scene. What is the influence of the mechanism of injury?].[现场损伤的严重程度和类型。损伤机制有何影响?]
Unfallchirurg. 2010 May;113(5):360-5. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1776-x.
3
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.
医师配备的紧急医疗服务中的质量测量:系统文献回顾。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Feb 1;31(1):2-10. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy106.
4
Motion and dural sac compression in the upper cervical spine during the application of a cervical collar in case of unstable craniocervical junction-A study in two new cadaveric trauma models.在上颈椎不稳定颅颈交界区损伤模型中,颈托固定时的颈椎运动与硬脊膜囊受压的关系:两种新的尸体创伤模型研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 6;13(4):e0195215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195215. eCollection 2018.
加权kappa系数:用于衡量名义尺度上的一致性,并考虑了尺度不一致或部分得分的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
4
Reduction in mortality of severely injured patients in Germany.德国严重创伤患者死亡率降低。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Mar;105(13):225-31. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0225. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
5
Field triage in trauma--do the data really justify the conclusions?创伤现场分诊——数据真的能证明这些结论吗?
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 May 29;17:24; author reply 25. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-24.
6
Initial clinical experience with a 64-MDCT whole-body scanner in an emergency department: better time management and diagnostic quality?64层螺旋CT全身扫描仪在急诊科的初步临床应用经验:更好的时间管理和诊断质量?
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):648-57. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816275f3.
7
[Primary documentation quality for paper-assisted digital mission data documentation. Initial results from the air rescue service].[纸质辅助数字任务数据记录的主要文档质量。空中救援服务的初步结果]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Jan;58(1):24-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1435-6.
8
[Pre-hospital emergency sonography of trauma patients].[创伤患者的院前急诊超声检查]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Jan;58(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1447-2.
9
Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review.创伤患者的漏诊损伤:文献综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2008 Aug 23;2:20. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-2-20.
10
[Prehospital treatment of severely injured patients in the field: an update].[现场严重受伤患者的院前治疗:最新进展]
Chirurg. 2007 Oct;78(10):875-84. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1410-9.