Reis Regimarina Soares, Coimbra Liberata Campos, da Silva Antônio Augusto Moura, Santos Alcione Miranda Dos, Alves Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto E, Lamy Zeni Carvalho, Ribeiro Sabrina Varão Oliveira, Dias Maria Socorro de Araújo, da Silva Raimundo Antonio
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Nov;18(11):3321-31. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013001100022.
Questionnaires adapted to the Brazilian reality (Primary Care Assessment Tool) to evaluate access to and use of services were distributed to 30 managers, 80 professionals and a random sample of 882 Family Health Strategy (FHS) users in São Luís in the state of Maranhão. The differences between the evaluations of managers, professionals and users were identified by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post test. Users faced difficulties in access to and use of the services, which were also considered unsatisfactory by managers and professionals. Access was the dimension with the worst evaluation, and non-functioning of units after 6 p.m. and at weekends were the main difficulties. The evaluations of the managers and professionals were almost always divergent from those of the users, with the evaluation of the managers being more favorable. The fact that the service was free of charge, the use of preventive services and the FHS services before the specialized care were well evaluated. The operation of units should attend users' needs, especially that of the working population. Strengthening social participation in local management of the FHS may assist in identifying these needs, thereby reducing the divergent opinions of the players involved.
为评估服务的可及性和使用情况,向30名管理人员、80名专业人员以及马拉尼昂州圣路易斯市882名家庭健康战略(FHS)使用者的随机样本发放了适用于巴西实际情况的调查问卷(初级保健评估工具)。通过Kruskal-Wallis检验和邓恩事后检验确定管理人员、专业人员和使用者评估之间的差异。使用者在获得和使用服务方面面临困难,管理人员和专业人员也认为这些服务不尽人意。可及性是评估最差的维度,下午6点后和周末单位无法正常运作是主要困难。管理人员和专业人员的评估几乎总是与使用者的评估不同,管理人员的评估更为有利。该服务免费、预防性服务的使用以及在接受专科护理之前使用FHS服务都得到了好评。单位的运营应满足使用者的需求,尤其是在职人群的需求。加强社会对FHS地方管理的参与可能有助于确定这些需求,从而减少相关各方的不同意见。