Suppr超能文献

三种放射性标记底物施用于沉积物进行营养研究的技术比较:微生物的掺入。

Comparison of three techniques for administering radiolabeled substrates to sediments for trophic studies: Incorporation by microbes.

机构信息

Department of Oceanography, Florida State University, 32306-3048, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Microb Ecol. 1989 May;17(3):237-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02012837.

Abstract

Three principal methods have been used to administer substrates to sediments: injection, porewater replacement, and slurry. Here we assess how each of these techniques affects incorporation of radiolabels into macromolecules of marine sedimentary microbes. Eighty-five cores of intertidal sand were collected in a randomized-block, factorial design. One set of cores received(14)C-bicarbonate/(3)H-thymidine and was incubated in the light; another set received(14)C-acetate/(3)H-thymidine and was incubated in the dark. Following a 5-hour incubation, sediments were analyzed for incorporation of radiolabel into lipid fractions (neutral, glyco-, and polar) and DNA. The three methods of isotope administration were also applied to cores subsequently analyzed for polar lipid phosphates and phospholipid fatty-acid (PLFA) profiles. In general, incorporation was greatest when injections were made, consistent with the prediction that incorporation would decrease as specific activity of the radiolabeled substrate was diminished by dilution. The ratio of(14)C from acetate incorporated into polar and glycolipid fractions indicated that a significant disturbance accompanied the porewater and slurry techniques. Substantial amounts of(3)H were recovered in the neutral-lipid fraction, indicating that thymidine was catabolized by sedimentary microbes and tritiated products were incorporated by eukaryotes. There were no significant differences in PLFA profiles or estimates of microbial biomass among methods or controls. Incorporation of(3)H into DNA was similar with all combinations of methods and radiocarbon substrates.(14)C was extensively incorporated into DNA, indicating that photoautotrophs and heterotrophs utilized radiocarbon from bicarbonate and acetate, respectively, for de novo synthesis of DNA. Injection is suggested as the method of choice, as it presents more flexibility in its application than porewater replacement and disturbs the consortia of gradients in sediments to a significantly lesser degree than porewater replacement and slurry.

摘要

三种主要的方法被用于向沉积物中添加基质

注射、孔隙水替换和泥浆。在这里,我们评估了这些技术中的每一种方法如何影响放射性标记物掺入海洋沉积物微生物的大分子中。采用随机块、析因设计采集了 85 个潮间带砂芯。一组芯接受(14)C-碳酸氢盐/(3)H-胸苷,并在光照下孵育;另一组接受(14)C-乙酸盐/(3)H-胸苷,并在黑暗中孵育。孵育 5 小时后,分析沉积物中放射性标记物掺入脂质(中性、糖基和极性)和 DNA 的情况。随后,还将这三种同位素添加方法应用于分析极性脂磷酸和磷脂脂肪酸 (PLFA) 图谱的芯。一般来说,当进行注射时,掺入量最大,这与以下预测一致,即随着放射性标记底物的比活度因稀释而降低,掺入量会减少。从乙酸盐掺入到极性和糖脂部分的(14)C 的比例表明,孔隙水和泥浆技术伴随着显著的干扰。相当数量的(3)H 被回收在中性脂质部分,表明胸苷被沉积物微生物分解代谢,氚化产物被真核生物掺入。方法之间或对照之间没有 PLFA 图谱或微生物生物量估计值的显著差异。所有方法和放射性碳底物的组合中,(3)H 掺入 DNA 的情况相似。(14)C 广泛掺入 DNA,表明自养生物和异养生物分别利用碳酸氢盐和乙酸盐中的放射性碳从头合成 DNA。建议采用注射方法,因为与孔隙水替换相比,它在应用方面具有更大的灵活性,并且对沉积物中梯度的生物群落的干扰程度显著低于孔隙水替换和泥浆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验