MacDougall D Robert
Novel Tech Ethics at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2013 Sep;23(3):249-74. doi: 10.1353/ken.2013.0010.
Many authors have addressed the morality of physicians' strikes on the assumption that medical practice is morally different from other kinds of occupations. This article analyzes three prominent theoretical accounts that attempt to ground such special moral obligations for physicians--practice-based accounts, utilitarian accounts, and social contract accounts--and assesses their applicability to the problem of the morality of strikes. After critiquing these views, it offers a fourth view grounding special moral obligations in voluntary commitments, and explains why this is a preferable basis for understanding physicians' moral obligations in general and especially as pertaining to strikes.
许多作者在假定医疗实践在道德上不同于其他职业的基础上探讨了医生罢工的道德问题。本文分析了三种试图为医生确立这种特殊道德义务的突出理论解释——基于实践的解释、功利主义解释和社会契约解释——并评估它们对罢工道德问题的适用性。在对这些观点进行批判之后,本文提出了第四种观点,即将特殊道德义务建立在自愿承诺的基础上,并解释了为什么这是理解医生一般道德义务,尤其是与罢工相关的道德义务的更可取基础。