Frakking Thuy T, Chang Anne B, O'Grady Kerry-Ann F, Walker-Smith Katie, Weir Kelly A
Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Trials. 2013 Nov 7;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-377.
Oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) can lead to recurrent respiratory illnesses and chronic lung disease in children. Current clinical feeding evaluations performed by speech pathologists have poor reliability in detecting OPA when compared to radiological procedures such as the modified barium swallow (MBS). Improved ability to diagnose OPA accurately via clinical evaluation potentially reduces reliance on expensive, less readily available radiological procedures. Our study investigates the utility of adding cervical auscultation (CA), a technique of listening to swallowing sounds, in improving the diagnostic accuracy of a clinical evaluation for the detection of OPA.
We plan an open, unblinded, randomised controlled trial at a paediatric tertiary teaching hospital. Two hundred and sixteen children fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomised to one of the two clinical assessment techniques for the clinical detection of OPA: (1) clinical feeding evaluation only (CFE) group or (2) clinical feeding evaluation with cervical auscultation (CFE + CA) group. All children will then undergo an MBS to determine radiologically assessed OPA. The primary outcome is the presence or absence of OPA, as determined on MBS using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Our main objective is to determine the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of 'CFE + CA' versus 'CFE' only compared to MBS-identified OPA.
Early detection and appropriate management of OPA is important to prevent chronic pulmonary disease and poor growth in children. As the reliability of CFE to detect OPA is low, a technique that can improve the diagnostic accuracy of the CFE will help minimise consequences to the paediatric respiratory system. Cervical auscultation is a technique that has previously been documented as a clinical adjunct to the CFE; however, no published RCTs addressing the reliability of this technique in children exist. Our study will be the first to establish the utility of CA in assessing and diagnosing OPA risk in young children.
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR) number ACTRN12613000589785.
口咽误吸(OPA)可导致儿童反复出现呼吸道疾病和慢性肺病。与改良吞钡检查(MBS)等放射学检查方法相比,言语病理学家目前进行的临床喂养评估在检测OPA方面可靠性较差。通过临床评估准确诊断OPA的能力提高,可能会减少对昂贵且不易获得的放射学检查方法的依赖。我们的研究调查了增加颈部听诊(CA)这一听取吞咽声音的技术,对提高OPA临床评估诊断准确性的效用。
我们计划在一家儿科三级教学医院进行一项开放、非盲、随机对照试验。符合纳入标准的216名儿童将被随机分配到两种用于临床检测OPA的临床评估技术之一:(1)仅临床喂养评估(CFE)组或(2)颈部听诊临床喂养评估(CFE + CA)组。然后所有儿童都将接受MBS以确定放射学评估的OPA。主要结局是使用渗透 - 误吸量表在MBS上确定的OPA的存在与否。我们的主要目标是确定与MBS确定的OPA相比,“CFE + CA”与仅“CFE”的敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值。
OPA的早期检测和适当管理对于预防儿童慢性肺病和生长发育不良很重要。由于CFE检测OPA的可靠性较低,一种能够提高CFE诊断准确性的技术将有助于将对小儿呼吸系统的影响降至最低。颈部听诊是一种先前已被记录为CFE临床辅助手段的技术;然而,尚无已发表的随机对照试验探讨该技术在儿童中的可靠性。我们的研究将首次确定CA在评估和诊断幼儿OPA风险中的效用。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)编号ACTRN12613000589785。