Irstea, U.R. MALY, 5 rue de la Doua, CS70077, 69626 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Irstea, U.R. MALY, 5 rue de la Doua, CS70077, 69626 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Chemosphere. 2014 Mar;98:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
This study aimed at evaluating and comparing five integrative samplers for the monitoring of indicator and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water: semi-permeable membrane device (SPMD), silicone rubber, low-density polyethylene (LDPE) strip, Chemcatcher and a continuous-flow integrative sampler (CFIS). These samplers were spiked with performance reference compounds (PRCs) and then simultaneously exposed under constant agitation and temperature in a 200 L stainless steel tank for periods ranging from one day to three months. A constant PCB concentration of about 1 ng·L(-1) was achieved by immersing a large amount of silicone rubber sheets ("dosing sheets") spiked with the target PCBs. The uptake of PCBs in the five samplers showed overall good repeatability and their accumulation was linear with time. The samplers SPMD, silicone rubber and LDPE strip were the most promising in terms of achieving low limits of quantification. Time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations of PCBs in water were estimated from uptake of PCBs using the sampling rates calculated from the release of PRCs. Except for Chemcatcher, a good agreement was found between the different samplers and TWA concentrations ranged between 0.4 and 2.8 times the nominal water concentration. Finally, the influence of calculation methods (sampler-water partition coefficients, selected PRCs, models) on final TWA concentrations was studied.
本研究旨在评估和比较五种集成采样器,用于监测水中的指示物和二噁英类多氯联苯(PCBs):半渗透膜装置(SPMD)、硅橡胶、低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)带、Chemcatcher 和连续流动集成采样器(CFIS)。这些采样器中加入了性能参考化合物(PRCs),然后在一个 200 升的不锈钢罐中在恒定搅拌和温度下同时暴露一段时间,范围从一天到三个月不等。通过浸入大量涂有目标 PCB 的硅橡胶片(“剂量片”)来实现约 1ng·L(-1) 的恒定 PCB 浓度。五种采样器中 PCB 的吸收总体上具有良好的可重复性,并且它们的积累与时间呈线性关系。在实现低定量下限方面,SPMD、硅橡胶和 LDPE 带采样器最有前途。使用从释放 PRC 计算的采样率,从 PCB 的吸收来估算水中 PCBs 的时间加权平均(TWA)浓度。除了 Chemcatcher 外,不同采样器之间的 TWA 浓度差异较大,范围在名义水浓度的 0.4 到 2.8 倍之间。最后,研究了计算方法(采样器-水分配系数、选择的 PRC、模型)对最终 TWA 浓度的影响。