Schneider Horacio, Sampaio Iracilda
Instituto de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus de Bragança, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro s/n, Bragança, Pará, CEP 68600-000, Brazil.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Jan;82 Pt B:348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
This paper provides an overview of the taxonomy of New World primates from proposals of the 1980's based on morphology to the great number of studies based on molecular data aiming for the elucidation of the phylogeny of New World monkeys. The innovations of the first molecular phylogeny presented by Schneider et al. (1993) positioned Callimico as a sister group of Callithrix and Cebuella; Callicebus as a member of the pitheciids; Brachyteles as sister to Lagothrix; and the night monkeys (Aotus), capuchins (Cebus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) in the same clade with the small callitrichines. These results were subsequently confirmed by dozens of subsequent studies using data from DNA sequences. Some issues difficult to resolve with the phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences, such as the diversification of the oldest lineages (pitheciids, atelids and cebids), and the confirmation of Aotus as a member of the Cebinae clade (together with Cebus/Saimiri), were clarified with new molecular approaches based on the presence or absence of Alu insertions as well as through the use of phylogenomics. At this time, all relationships at the intergeneric level had been deciphered, with the exception of the definition of the sister group of callitrichines (whether Aotus or Cebus/Saimiri are sister to callitrichines, or if Aotus, Saimiri and Cebus form a clade together). Future studies should prioritize the alpha taxonomy of most Neotropical primate groups, and the use of phylogenetic and geographic data, combined with reliable estimates of divergence times, to clarify the taxonomic status at species and genus level, as well as to help understand the evolutionary history of this remarkable and highly diversified group.
本文概述了新大陆灵长类动物的分类学,从20世纪80年代基于形态学的分类提议,到如今大量基于分子数据的研究,这些研究旨在阐明新大陆猴的系统发育。施奈德等人(1993年)提出的首个分子系统发育研究有诸多创新之处,将伶猴属定位为狨属和倭狨属的姐妹群;将夜猴属归为僧面猴科成员;将绒毛蛛猴属作为绒毛猴属的姐妹属;并将夜猴属(夜猴)、卷尾猴属(卷尾猴)和松鼠猴属(松鼠猴)与小型狨猴科动物归为同一进化枝。随后的几十项利用DNA序列数据的研究证实了这些结果。一些用DNA序列系统发育分析难以解决的问题,比如最古老谱系(僧面猴科、蛛猴科和卷尾猴科)的分化,以及确认夜猴属作为卷尾猴亚科进化枝(与卷尾猴属/松鼠猴属在一起)的成员,通过基于是否存在Alu插入的新分子方法以及系统发育基因组学得以阐明。此时,除了狨猴科动物姐妹群的定义(夜猴属还是卷尾猴属/松鼠猴属是狨猴科动物的姐妹属,或者夜猴属、松鼠猴属和卷尾猴属是否共同构成一个进化枝)之外,所有属间关系都已明晰。未来的研究应优先关注大多数新热带灵长类动物类群的α分类学,以及利用系统发育和地理数据,结合可靠的分歧时间估计,来阐明物种和属水平的分类地位,并有助于理解这个非凡且高度多样化群体的进化历史。