• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

20 年来严重脓毒症患者死亡率趋势:一项比较性荟萃分析*。

Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.

机构信息

1The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 2Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA. 3Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA. 4Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital, Bedford, MA. 5The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):625-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026
PMID:24201173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4313930/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Trends in severe sepsis mortality derived from administrative data may be biased by changing International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, coding practices. We sought to determine temporal trends in severe sepsis mortality using clinical trial data that does not rely on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modifications coding and compare mortality trends in trial data with those observed from administrative data.

DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE for multicenter randomized trials that enrolled patients with severe sepsis from 1991 to 2009. We calculated standardized mortality ratios for each trial from observed 28-day mortality of usual care participants and predicted mortality from severity-of-illness scores. To compare mortality trends from clinical trials to administrative data, we identified adult severe sepsis hospitalizations in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1993-2009, using two previously validated algorithms.

SETTING

In-patient.

PATIENTS

Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 3,244 potentially eligible articles, we included 36 multicenter severe sepsis trials, with a total of 14,418 participants in a usual care arm. Participants with severe sepsis receiving usual care had a 28-day mortality of 33.2%. Observed mortality decreased 3.0% annually (95% CI, 0.8%-5.0%; p = 0.009), decreasing from 46.9% (standardized mortality ratio 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.03) during years 1991-1995 to 29% (standardized mortality ratio 0.53; 95% CI, 0.50-0.57) during years 2006-2009 (3.0% annual change). Trends in hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis identified from administrative data (Angus definition, 4.7% annual change; 95% CI, 4.1%-5.3%; p = 0.69 and Martin definition, 3.5% annual change; 95% CI, 3.0%-4.1%; p = 0.97) were similar to trends identified from clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Since 1991, patients with severe sepsis enrolled in usual care arms of multicenter randomized trials have experienced decreasing mortality. The mortality trends identified in clinical trial participants appear similar to those identified using administrative data and support the use of administrative data to monitor mortality trends in patients with severe sepsis.

摘要

目的

源于行政数据的严重脓毒症死亡率趋势可能受到国际疾病分类第 9 版临床修订版(ICD-9-CM)编码实践改变的影响。我们旨在使用不依赖 ICD-9-CM 编码的临床试验数据来确定严重脓毒症死亡率的时间趋势,并比较临床试验死亡率趋势与从行政数据中观察到的死亡率趋势。

设计

我们在 MEDLINE 上搜索了 1991 年至 2009 年间多中心随机试验,这些试验招募了严重脓毒症患者。我们根据常规治疗组观察到的 28 天死亡率和严重程度评分预测死亡率,计算了每个试验的标准化死亡率比。为了比较临床试验和行政数据的死亡率趋势,我们使用了两个先前验证过的算法,从 1993 年至 2009 年全国住院患者样本中确定了成人严重脓毒症住院患者。

设置

住院患者。

患者

患有严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

在 3244 篇潜在合格的文章中,我们纳入了 36 项多中心严重脓毒症试验,共有 14418 名常规治疗组患者参与。接受常规治疗的严重脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率为 33.2%。观察到的死亡率每年下降 3.0%(95%CI,0.8%-5.0%;p = 0.009),从 1991 年至 1995 年的 46.9%(标准化死亡率比 0.94;95%CI,0.86-1.03)降至 2006 年至 2009 年的 29%(标准化死亡率比 0.53;95%CI,0.50-0.57)(每年 3.0%的变化)。从行政数据中确定的严重脓毒症患者的住院死亡率趋势(安格斯定义,每年 4.7%的变化;95%CI,4.1%-5.3%;p = 0.69 和马丁定义,每年 3.5%的变化;95%CI,3.0%-4.1%;p = 0.97)与临床试验中确定的趋势相似。

结论

自 1991 年以来,参加多中心随机试验常规治疗组的严重脓毒症患者死亡率呈下降趋势。临床试验参与者确定的死亡率趋势与使用行政数据确定的死亡率趋势相似,支持使用行政数据监测严重脓毒症患者的死亡率趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/4313930/b2df0f8e5323/nihms-549640-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/4313930/d9fe902e3e5a/nihms-549640-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/4313930/b2df0f8e5323/nihms-549640-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/4313930/d9fe902e3e5a/nihms-549640-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f71f/4313930/b2df0f8e5323/nihms-549640-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.20 年来严重脓毒症患者死亡率趋势:一项比较性荟萃分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):625-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000026.
2
Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States.美国严重脓毒症发病率和死亡率的基准研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8.
3
The Effect of Early Goal-Directed Therapy on Outcome in Adult Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.早期目标导向治疗对成年严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Anesth Analg. 2016 Aug;123(2):371-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001278.
4
The association of lacking insurance with outcomes of severe sepsis: retrospective analysis of an administrative database*.缺乏保险与严重脓毒症结局的关系:行政数据库的回顾性分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):583-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000435667.15070.9c.
5
High-volume haemofiltration for sepsis in adults.成人脓毒症的高容量血液滤过
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 31;1(1):CD008075. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008075.pub3.
6
Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.早期目标导向治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的Meta 分析和随机对照试验序贯分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 May;33(5):296-309. doi: 10.1177/0885066616671710. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
7
Case Fatality and Adverse Outcomes Are Reduced in Pregnant Women With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Compared With Age-Matched Comorbid-Matched Nonpregnant Women.与年龄匹配的合并症非孕妇相比,患有严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的孕妇的病死率和不良结局降低。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003348.
8
Mortality Measures to Profile Hospital Performance for Patients With Septic Shock.用于评估脓毒性休克患者的医院绩效的死亡率指标。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;46(8):1247-1254. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003184.
9
Effects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock after a strict resuscitation protocol: a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial.硝酸甘油对严格复苏方案后严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者舌下微循环血流的影响:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):93-100. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02fc1.
10
A Severe Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model and Score for Use With Administrative Data.一种用于行政数据的严重脓毒症死亡率预测模型及评分
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):319-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001392.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing FDA approved therapeutics for treating sepsis phenotypes: A network modeling approach based on neutrophil proteomics.确定用于治疗脓毒症表型的FDA批准的治疗方法的优先级:一种基于中性粒细胞蛋白质组学的网络建模方法。
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1646141. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1646141. eCollection 2025.
2
Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.变革脓毒症管理:人工智能驱动的早期检测与个性化治疗创新
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05588-0.
3
Proactive Telehealth-Based Sepsis Transition and Recovery Support, Hospital Readmission, and Mortality: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.试验样本量对治疗效果估计的影响:荟萃流行病学研究。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 24;346:f2304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2304.
2
Severe sepsis cohorts derived from claims-based strategies appear to be biased toward a more severely ill patient population.基于索赔策略得出的严重脓毒症队列似乎偏向于病情更严重的患者群体。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):945-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827466f1.
3
Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis.
基于主动远程医疗的脓毒症过渡与康复支持、医院再入院率及死亡率:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3699.
4
Intelligent Prediction Platform for Sepsis Risk Based on Real-Time Dynamic Temporal Features: Design Study.基于实时动态时间特征的脓毒症风险智能预测平台:设计研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 30;13:e74940. doi: 10.2196/74940.
5
Progression of Kidney Fibrosis after Sepsis: Underestimated Role of Resident Macrophages and Recruited Monocytes.脓毒症后肾纤维化的进展:驻留巨噬细胞和募集单核细胞被低估的作用
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Mar 28;36(7):1417-1427. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000712.
6
The Novel Role of the Expression of Toll-like Receptors TLR-5, TLR-6, and TLR-9 and Associated Up-Regulation of Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor (PD-1) and Its Ligand (PD-L1) in Lung Sepsis.Toll样受体TLR-5、TLR-6和TLR-9的表达以及程序性细胞死亡1受体(PD-1)及其配体(PD-L1)的相关上调在肺部脓毒症中的新作用
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 4;26(5):2274. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052274.
7
Sepsis in Internal Medicine: blood culture-based subtypes, hospital outcomes, and predictive biomarkers.内科脓毒症:基于血培养的亚型、医院结局及预测生物标志物
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 30;12:1503868. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1503868. eCollection 2025.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Failure-to-Rescue After Postoperative Sepsis After Noncardiac Surgery.非心脏手术后术后脓毒症患者抢救失败的种族和民族差异
Anesth Analg. 2025 Jul 1;141(1):181-189. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007303. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
9
SeptAsTERS- SeptiCyte® RAPID as assessment tool for early recognition of sepsis - a prospective observational study.SeptAsTERS - SeptiCyte® RAPID作为早期识别脓毒症的评估工具——一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Infection. 2025 Jun;53(3):953-965. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02409-4. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
10
Three-year mortality of ICU survivors with sepsis, an infection or an inflammatory illness: an individually matched cohort study of ICU patients in the Netherlands from 2007 to 2019.2007 年至 2019 年荷兰 ICU 患者的一项 ICU 幸存者感染性疾病或炎症性疾病的个体匹配队列研究:感染性疾病或炎症性疾病 ICU 幸存者的 3 年死亡率。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 19;28(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05165-x.
利用行政索赔识别严重脓毒症患者: Angus 实施的国际严重脓毒症共识会议定义的患者层面验证。
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):e39-43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86.
4
Population burden of long-term survivorship after severe sepsis in older Americans.美国老年人严重脓毒症后长期生存的人口负担。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1070-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03989.x. Epub 2012 May 29.
5
Association of diagnostic coding with trends in hospitalizations and mortality of patients with pneumonia, 2003-2009.2003-2009 年肺炎患者住院和死亡的诊断编码与趋势的相关性研究。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1405-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.384.
6
Incident stroke and mortality associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with severe sepsis.严重脓毒症住院患者新发心房颤动与中风和死亡事件相关。
JAMA. 2011 Nov 23;306(20):2248-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1615. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
7
Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007.2003 年至 2007 年美国严重脓毒症的住院治疗、费用和结果。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):754-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232db65.
8
The implications of long-term acute care hospital transfer practices for measures of in-hospital mortality and length of stay.长期急性护理医院转院实践对住院死亡率和住院时间衡量指标的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan 1;185(1):53-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201106-1084OC.
9
Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007).21 世纪(2000-2007 年)全国范围内严重脓毒症的流行趋势。
Chest. 2011 Nov;140(5):1223-1231. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0352. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.单中心试验比多中心试验显示出更大的治疗效果:来自荟萃流行病学研究的证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):39-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00006.