aClinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research bThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust cSchool of Cancer and Enabling Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester dAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, UK.
Melanoma Res. 2014 Feb;24(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000025.
We previously demonstrated that circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are detectable by the MelCAM and high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA)-dependent CellSearch platform. However, CTCs which do not express these capture and detection markers are not detectable by CellSearch. Consequently, we explored the use of isolation by size of epithelial tumour cells (ISET), a marker independent, filtration-based device to determine the prevalence and heterogeneity of CTCs in metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients. Ninety patients were prospectively recruited and blood samples taken before treatment. Patients' blood was filtered using the ISET platform. CTCs were enumerated using dual immunohistochemistry with positive selection by S100 expression and exclusion of leucocytes and endothelial cells expressing CD45 or CD144, respectively. A panel of markers (Melan-A, MITF, MelCAM, high molecular melanoma-associated antigen, CD271 and MAGEC) was also examined. Fifty-one patients (57%) had CTCs (range 1-44 CTCs/4 ml blood) and 12 patients also had circulating tumour microemboli. Seven patients had S100- CTCs, 11 patients' CTCs were S100+ and 33 patients had S100+ and S100- CTCs. Substantial intrapatient and interpatient heterogeneity was observed for all other melanoma-associated markers. CTCs in metastatic cutaneous melanoma are detectable using the flexible marker-independent ISET platform. CTCs display significant marker expression heterogeneity implying that marker-dependent platforms would not detect all CTCs and multimarker assays are now required to reveal the biological significance of this CTC heterogeneity.
我们之前已经证明,循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)可以通过依赖于 MelCAM 和高分子量黑色素瘤相关抗原(HMW-MAA)的 CellSearch 平台检测到。然而,不表达这些捕获和检测标志物的 CTCs 则无法通过 CellSearch 检测到。因此,我们探索了使用大小分离上皮肿瘤细胞(ISET)的方法,这是一种不依赖标志物、基于过滤的设备,以确定转移性皮肤黑色素瘤患者 CTCs 的患病率和异质性。90 名患者前瞻性入组,并在治疗前采集血样。患者的血液使用 ISET 平台进行过滤。使用双重免疫组织化学方法对 CTCs 进行计数,通过 S100 表达进行阳性选择,并分别排除表达 CD45 或 CD144 的白细胞和内皮细胞。还检查了一组标志物(Melan-A、MITF、MelCAM、高分子黑色素瘤相关抗原、CD271 和 MAGEC)。51 名患者(57%)有 CTCs(范围 1-44 CTCs/4 ml 血液),12 名患者还有循环肿瘤微栓。7 名患者有 S100-CTC,11 名患者的 CTCs 是 S100+,33 名患者的 CTCs 是 S100+和 S100-。对于所有其他与黑色素瘤相关的标志物,都观察到了显著的个体内和个体间异质性。使用灵活的不依赖标志物的 ISET 平台可以检测转移性皮肤黑色素瘤中的 CTCs。CTCs 显示出显著的标志物表达异质性,这意味着依赖标志物的平台可能无法检测到所有的 CTCs,现在需要进行多标志物检测来揭示这种 CTC 异质性的生物学意义。