• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护医师置管的 Broviac 导管的成本和安全性。

Cost and safety of pediatric intensive care physician-placed broviac catheters.

机构信息

1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI. 2Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI. 3Department of Pediatric Surgery, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000022.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000022
PMID:24201858
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost and safety of placement of Broviac catheters in children by pediatric intensivists in a sedation suite versus placement by pediatric surgeons in the operating room.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Pediatric sedation suite and operating rooms in a tertiary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

All pediatric patients with Broviac catheters placed (n = 253) at this institution over a 3-year period from 2007 to 2009.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We reviewed the charts of all pediatric patients with Broviac catheters placed, either by intensivists or surgeons, and compared cost and outcomes. Procedure safety was assessed and categorized into immediate, short-term (within 2 wk of procedure), and long-term outcomes. Anesthetic safety and billing data for the procedure were also collected. Among similar patient populations, immediate complications, such as pneumothorax, procedure failure (p > 0.999), and anesthetic complications (p = 0.60), were not significantly different. Short-term outcomes, including infection (p = 0.27) and catheter malfunction (p > 0.999), were not different. Long-term outcomes, including mean indwelling catheter days (p = 0.60) and removal due to catheter infection (p = 0.09), were not different between the groups. Overall cost of the procedure was significantly different: $7,031 (± $784) when performed by surgeons and $3,565 (± $311) when performed by intensivists (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric critical care physicians can place Broviac catheters as safely as pediatric surgeons and at a lower cost in a defined patient population.

摘要

目的

比较在镇静套房中由儿科重症监护医生和在手术室中由小儿外科医生置管的布罗维亚导管在儿童中的成本和安全性。

设计

单中心回顾性分析。

设置

三级儿童医院的儿科镇静套房和手术室。

患者

2007 年至 2009 年期间在该机构接受布罗维亚导管置管的所有儿科患者(n=253)。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

我们回顾了所有接受布罗维亚导管置管的儿科患者的病历,这些患者是由重症监护医生还是外科医生进行置管的,并比较了成本和结果。评估了程序安全性,并将其分类为即时、短期(程序后 2 周内)和长期结果。还收集了麻醉安全性和程序计费数据。在类似的患者人群中,即时并发症,如气胸、程序失败(p>0.999)和麻醉并发症(p=0.60)没有显著差异。短期结果,包括感染(p=0.27)和导管故障(p>0.999),两组之间无差异。长期结果,包括平均留置导管天数(p=0.60)和因导管感染而拔除(p=0.09),两组之间无差异。该手术的总费用有显著差异:外科医生操作的费用为 7031 美元(±784 美元),而重症监护医生操作的费用为 3565 美元(±311 美元)(p<0.001)。

结论

在特定患者人群中,儿科重症监护医生可以像小儿外科医生一样安全地置管布罗维亚导管,且成本更低。

相似文献

1
Cost and safety of pediatric intensive care physician-placed broviac catheters.儿科重症监护医师置管的 Broviac 导管的成本和安全性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000022.
2
Transhepatic Broviac catheter placement for long-term central venous access in critically ill children with complex congenital heart disease.经肝置入Broviac导管用于患有复杂先天性心脏病的危重症儿童的长期中心静脉通路建立。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 May;8(3):248-53. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000265327.93745.89.
3
Use of Broviac/Hickman catheter for long-term venous access in pediatric cancer patients.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;18(2):143-8.
4
[Long-term experiences with central venous catheters in pediatric oncology].
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1990 Jan;138(1):26-30.
5
Traditional Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Versus Transhepatic Venous Catheters in Infants and Young Children.传统长期中心静脉导管与婴幼儿经肝静脉导管的比较
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;18(10):944-948. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001276.
6
Transdiaphragmatic tunneled Broviac catheters: Cost-effective perioperative central venous access in infants undergoing cardiac surgery.经横膈膜隧道式 Broviac 导管:心脏手术患儿经济有效的围手术期中心静脉通路。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Dec;160(6):1559-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Differences in the outcome of surgically placed long-term central venous catheters in neonates: neck vs groin placement.新生儿外科置入长期中心静脉导管的结局差异:颈部与腹股沟置入对比。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jan;40(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.015.
8
Central venous catheter placement at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation: is it safe?体外膜肺氧合撤管时行中心静脉导管置入:是否安全?
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):53-7; discussion 58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.018.
9
Comparison between sedation room and operating room in central venous catheter positioning in children.在儿童中心静脉置管中镇静室与手术室的比较。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar;22(2):184-188. doi: 10.1177/1129729820932415. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients.单机构对儿童和成人患者植入式中心静脉通路装置所致机械并发症进行血管内治疗的经验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Feb;180(2):527-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800527.