• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险能否改善员工的健康状况并降低成本?对 Geisinger 员工健康与健康计划的评估。

Can health insurance improve employee health outcome and reduce cost? An evaluation of Geisinger's employee health and wellness program.

机构信息

Geisinger Health System (Drs Maeng and Steinhubl and Mr Pitcavage) and Geisinger Health Plan (Ms Tomcavage), Danville, Pa.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Nov;55(11):1271-5. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000009.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000009
PMID:24202243
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a health plan-driven employee health and wellness program (known as MyHealth Rewards) on health outcomes (stroke and myocardial infarction) and cost of care.

METHODS

A cohort of Geisinger Health Plan members who were Geisinger Health System (GHS) employees throughout the study period (2007 to 2011) was compared with a comparison group consisting of Geisinger Health Plan members who were non-GHS employees.

RESULT

The GHS employee cohort experienced a stroke or myocardial infarction later than the non-GHS comparison group (hazard ratios of 0.73 and 0.56; P < 0.01). There was also a 10% to 13% cost reduction (P < 0.05) during the second and third years of the program. The cumulative return on investment was approximately 1.6.

CONCLUSION

Health plan-driven employee health and wellness programs similarly designed as MyHealth Rewards can potentially have a desirable impact on employee health and cost.

摘要

目的

评估一项以健康计划为驱动的员工健康和福利计划(称为 MyHealth Rewards)对健康结果(中风和心肌梗死)和医疗成本的影响。

方法

将整个研究期间(2007 年至 2011 年)一直是 Geisinger 健康计划成员且为 Geisinger 健康系统(GHS)员工的一组队列与由 Geisinger 健康计划成员但非 GHS 员工组成的对照组进行比较。

结果

GHS 员工队列发生中风或心肌梗死的时间晚于非 GHS 对照组(风险比分别为 0.73 和 0.56;P<0.01)。在计划的第二和第三年,成本也降低了 10%至 13%(P<0.05)。投资的累计回报率约为 1.6。

结论

类似 MyHealth Rewards 设计的以健康计划为驱动的员工健康和福利计划可能对员工的健康和成本产生理想的影响。

相似文献

1
Can health insurance improve employee health outcome and reduce cost? An evaluation of Geisinger's employee health and wellness program.医疗保险能否改善员工的健康状况并降低成本?对 Geisinger 员工健康与健康计划的评估。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Nov;55(11):1271-5. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000009.
2
Lowering employee health care costs through the Healthy Lifestyle Incentive Program.通过健康生活方式激励计划降低员工医疗保健成本。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 May-Jun;17(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181f54128.
3
The value of value-based insurance design: savings from eliminating drug co-payments.基于价值的保险设计的价值:消除药品自付费用带来的节省。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb;22(2):116-21.
4
Medical cost savings for web-based wellness program participants from employers engaged in health promotion activities.参与健康促进活动的雇主为参与网络健康计划的员工节省医疗费用。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(4):272-80. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.100415-QUAN-119.
5
A hospital system's wellness program linked to health plan enrollment cut hospitalizations but not overall costs.医院系统的健康计划与健康计划参与率相关,可降低住院率,但不会降低总体成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):477-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0090.
6
Carrots and sticks: impact of an incentive/disincentive employee flexible credit benefit plan on health status and medical costs.胡萝卜加大棒:激励/抑制型员工灵活信贷福利计划对健康状况和医疗成本的影响
Am J Health Promot. 1999 May-Jun;13(5):260-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.5.260.
7
Employee health benefit redesign at the academic health center: a case study.学术医疗中心的员工健康福利重新设计:案例研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):328-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318281a71c.
8
The impact of the highmark employee wellness programs on 4-year healthcare costs.高马克员工健康计划对四年医疗费用的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Feb;50(2):146-56. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181617855.
9
Managing manifest diseases, but not health risks, saved PepsiCo money over seven years.在七年时间里,管理显性疾病而非健康风险为百事公司节省了资金。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):124-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0625.
10
Incentives for nondiscriminatory wellness programs in group health plans. Final rule.团体健康计划中无歧视性健康计划的激励措施。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jun 3;78(106):33157-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of chronic disease prevention programs implemented by private health insurers: a systematic review.私营医疗保险机构实施的慢性病预防计划的影响:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 11;21(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07212-7.
2
Pharmaceutical use according to participation in worksite wellness screening and health campaigns.根据参与工作场所健康筛查和健康活动情况的药物使用。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Sep 11;12:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.008. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Medical cost analysis of a school district worksite wellness program.
一个学区工作场所健康计划的医疗成本分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Jan 26;3:159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.01.002. eCollection 2016 Jun.