Division of Otolaryngology, University of Connecticut, Farmington.
Division of Otolaryngology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jan;140(1):29-33. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5550.
National attention has focused on the importance of handoffs in medicine. Our practice during airway patient handoffs is to communicate a patient-specific emergency plan for airway reestablishment; patients who are not intubatable by standard means are at higher risk for failure. There is currently no standard classification system describing airway risk in tracheotomized patients.
To introduce and assess the interrater reliability of a simple airway risk classification system, the Connecticut Airway Risk Evaluation (CARE) system.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We created a novel classification system, the CARE system, based on ease of intubation and the need for ventilation: group 1, easily intubatable; group 2, intubatable with special equipment and/or maneuvers; group 3, not intubatable. A "v" was appended to any group number to indicate the need for mechanical ventilation. We performed a retrospective medical chart review of patients aged 0 to 18 years who were undergoing tracheotomy at our tertiary care pediatric hospital between January 2000 and April 2011. INTERVENTIONS Each patient's medical history, including airway disease and means of intubation, was reviewed by 4 raters. Patient airways were separately rated as CARE groups 1, 2, or 3, each group with or without a v appended, as appropriate, based on the available information.
After the patients were assigned to an airway group by each of the 4 raters, the interrater reliability was calculated to determine the ease of use of the rating system.
We identified complete data for 155 of 169 patients (92%), resulting in a total of 620 ratings. Based on the patient's ease of intubation, raters categorized tracheotomized patients into group 1 (70%, 432 of 620); group 2 (25%, 157 of 620); or group 3 (5%, 29 of 620), each with a v appended if appropriate. The interrater reliability was κ = 0.95.
We propose an airway risk classification system for tracheotomized patients, CARE, that has high interrater reliability and is easy to use and interpret. As medical providers and national organizations place more focus on improvements in interprovider communication, the creation of an airway handoff tool is integral to improving patient safety and airway management strategies following tracheotomy complications.
人们越来越关注医疗交接的重要性。我们在气道患者交接过程中,会沟通一个特定于患者的气道重建紧急计划;无法通过标准手段插管的患者发生失败的风险更高。目前,还没有描述气管切开患者气道风险的标准分类系统。
介绍并评估一种简单的气道风险分类系统——康涅狄格气道风险评估(CARE)系统的组间可靠性。
设计、设置、参与者:我们根据插管的难易程度和通气的需求,创建了一个新的分类系统,CARE 系统:1 组,易于插管;2 组,使用特殊设备和/或操作可插管;3 组,无法插管。任何组号后加一个“v”表示需要机械通气。我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 4 月期间在我们的三级儿科医院接受气管切开术的 0 至 18 岁患者进行了回顾性病历审查。干预:每位患者的病史,包括气道疾病和插管方式,由 4 名评估者进行回顾。根据可用信息,患者气道分别被评定为 CARE 组 1、2 或 3,每个组号后面是否加“v”,视情况而定。
在 4 名评估者分别为患者分配气道组后,计算组间可靠性以确定评分系统的易用性。
我们确定了 169 名患者中的 155 名(92%)的完整数据,共 620 次评分。根据患者插管的难易程度,评估者将气管切开患者分为 1 组(70%,432/620);2 组(25%,157/620);或 3 组(5%,29/620),如果合适,每组后面都加“v”。组间可靠性为κ=0.95。
我们提出了一种用于气管切开患者的气道风险分类系统 CARE,该系统具有较高的组间可靠性,易于使用和解释。随着医疗服务提供者和国家组织更加关注提高提供者之间的沟通效果,创建一个气道交接工具对于改善气管切开并发症后的患者安全和气道管理策略至关重要。