Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mem Cognit. 1977 Nov;5(6):648-57. doi: 10.3758/BF03197411.
Seven experiments were addressed to the general question of whether the identification of letters and numbers is a more rapid process than the categorization of such stimuli. Subjects were required to make a single response if a target stimulus specified by name (e.g., "A," "2") or designated by category class alone (e.g., "letter," "number") was presented in a trial. The principal findings were: (1) identification reaction times (RTs) were faster than categorization RTs: (2) RTs for targets shown without a context were faster than RTs for targets shown in the context of other stimuli; (3) identification RTs for targets shown in the context of stimuli from a different conceptual-taxonomic category were faster than RTs for targets shown in the context of stimuli from the same category only when target-context stimulus discriminability differencet were optimized. The results were interpreted in terms of a two-stage processing model in which context face,ors affect the duration of an initial encoding-scanning stage and search instruction (effective memory size) factors affect the duration of the memory comparison stage.
七个实验旨在探讨一个一般性问题,即识别字母和数字是否比对这些刺激进行分类的过程更快。在每次试验中,如果以名称(例如“ A”,“ 2”)或仅通过类别类别(例如“字母”,“数字”)指定的目标刺激出现,则要求受试者做出单一响应。主要发现包括:(1)识别反应时间(RT)比分类 RT 快;(2)在没有上下文的情况下显示目标的 RT 比在其他刺激的上下文中显示目标的 RT 快;(3)仅当目标-上下文刺激可辨别性差异优化时,在来自不同概念分类类别的刺激的上下文中显示的目标的识别 RT 比在来自同一类别的刺激的上下文中显示的目标的 RT 快。这些结果根据一个两阶段处理模型进行了解释,在该模型中,上下文的外观或影响初始编码扫描阶段的持续时间,而搜索指令(有效内存大小)因素则影响内存比较阶段的持续时间。