Tseng L F, Towell J F, Fujimoto J M
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986 Apr;237(1):65-74.
We have reported previously that i.v.t. beta-endorphin increases the release of immunoreactive Met-enkephalin but not Leuenkephalin or dynorphins from the spinal cord. To determine if the effect is specific to beta-endorphin, the present investigation tested i.v.t. beta-endorphin, its analogs and other opiate agonists with different opioid receptor activities for their ability to release Met-enkephalin using an intrathecal perfusion technique. Human beta-endorphin and its analogs, human beta-endorphin-(1-30), -(1-29) and -(1-28) which have an identical amino acid sequence in the NH2-terminus showed reduced stepwise potencies in releasing Met-enkephalin. The results correlated well with their analgesic potencies. Des-Met5-camel beta-endorphin (64 micrograms i.v.t.) which does not have a complete sequence of Met-enkephalin in its NH2-terminus but still retains 20% of camel beta-endorphin analgesic potency caused the spinal release of Met-enkephalin. Morphine (mu opioid receptor agonist, 40 micrograms), D-Ala2-D-Leu5-enkephalin (delta opioid receptor agonist, 80 micrograms) and U-50488H (kappa opioid receptor agonist, 160 micrograms) injected i.v.t. were unable to cause any release of Met-enkephalin. High-performance liquid chromatography after Sephadex G-50 gel chromatography indicated that the immunoreactive Met-enkephalin in the spinal perfusate released by i.v.t. beta-endorphin had a retention time identical to authentic Met-enkephalin. Intraventricular injection of Met-enkephalin, 4 nmol (2.3 micrograms), caused little increase of Met-enkephalin immunoreactivity in the spinal perfusate, whereas 4 nmol of i.v.t. beta-endorphin caused a marked increase of Met-enkephalin in the spinal perfusate. Inhibition of peptidase by i.v.t. aprotinin and bacitracin does not prevent the spinal release of Met-enkephalin induced by i.v.t. beta-endorphin. It is concluded that the release of Met-enkephalin was specific to beta-endorphin and the results were not due to cross-immunoreactivity of beta-endorphin or its metabolites.
我们之前曾报道,静脉注射β-内啡肽可增加脊髓中免疫反应性甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的释放,但不会增加亮氨酸脑啡肽或强啡肽的释放。为了确定这种作用是否特定于β-内啡肽,本研究使用鞘内灌注技术测试了静脉注射β-内啡肽、其类似物以及具有不同阿片受体活性的其他阿片类激动剂释放甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的能力。人β-内啡肽及其类似物,即人β-内啡肽-(1 - 30)、-(1 - 29)和-(1 - 28),它们在NH2末端具有相同的氨基酸序列,在释放甲硫氨酸脑啡肽方面显示出逐步降低的效力。结果与其镇痛效力密切相关。去甲硫氨酸5-骆驼β-内啡肽(静脉注射64微克),其NH2末端没有完整的甲硫氨酸脑啡肽序列,但仍保留20%的骆驼β-内啡肽镇痛效力,可引起脊髓中甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的释放。静脉注射吗啡(μ阿片受体激动剂,40微克)、D-丙氨酸2-D-亮氨酸5-脑啡肽(δ阿片受体激动剂,80微克)和U-50488H(κ阿片受体激动剂,160微克)均无法引起甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的任何释放。经Sephadex G-50凝胶色谱后的高效液相色谱表明,静脉注射β-内啡肽释放的脊髓灌流液中的免疫反应性甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的保留时间与 authentic Met-enkephalin相同。脑室内注射4纳摩尔(2.3微克)甲硫氨酸脑啡肽,脊髓灌流液中甲硫氨酸脑啡肽免疫反应性几乎没有增加,而静脉注射4纳摩尔β-内啡肽则导致脊髓灌流液中甲硫氨酸脑啡肽显著增加。静脉注射抑肽酶和杆菌肽抑制肽酶并不能阻止静脉注射β-内啡肽诱导的脊髓中甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的释放。得出的结论是,甲硫氨酸脑啡肽的释放特定于β-内啡肽,结果并非由于β-内啡肽或其代谢产物的交叉免疫反应性所致。