Department of Cardiology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Cardiology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;113(1):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) frequently requires postprocedural permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. We evaluated clinical and hemodynamic impact of PPM after TAVI. Clinical and echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed in 230 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI and echocardiography at baseline and after 6 months. Echocardiographic parameters included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) stroke volume, early mitral velocity/annulus velocity ratio (E/e'), right ventricular index of myocardial performance, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP), and aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation grades. Clinical outcomes included 2-year survival and cardiovascular and PPM-related event-free survival. The Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards Sapien prosthesis were used in 201 and 29 patients, respectively. PPM was required in 58 patients (25.4%). Two-year and event-free survival rates were similar between patients with and without PPM. At 6 months, patients with PPM demonstrated attenuated improvement in LVEF (-0.9 ± 8.7% vs 2.3 ± 10.8%, respectively, p = 0.03) and LV stroke volume (-2 ± 16 vs 4 ± 10 ml/m(2), respectively, p = 0.015), a trend toward smaller reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (-1 ± 12 vs -6 ± 10 mm Hg, respectively, p = 0.09), and deterioration of right ventricular index of myocardial performance (-3 ± 17% vs 5 ± 26%, respectively, p = 0.05). The differences in post-TAVI aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation grades were insignificant. In conclusion, PPM implantation after TAVI is associated with reduced LVEF and impaired LV unloading. However, this unfavorable hemodynamic response does not affect the 2-year clinical outcome. The maintenance of clinical benefit appears to be driven by TAVI-related recovery of LV and right ventricular performance that mitigates unfavorable impact of PPM.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)常需要术后植入永久性起搏器(PPM)。我们评估了 TAVI 后 PPM 的临床和血液动力学影响。回顾性分析了 230 例连续接受 TAVI 和基线及 6 个月后超声心动图检查的患者的临床和超声心动图数据。超声心动图参数包括左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室(LV)每搏量、二尖瓣早期速度/环速度比(E/e')、右心室心肌做功指数、收缩期肺动脉压(SPAP)以及主动脉瓣、二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流程度。临床结果包括 2 年生存率和心血管及 PPM 相关无事件生存率。采用美敦力 CoreValve 和爱德华兹 Sapien 人工瓣膜分别为 201 例和 29 例患者。58 例(25.4%)需要植入 PPM。有和没有 PPM 的患者的 2 年生存率和无事件生存率相似。6 个月时,植入 PPM 的患者 LVEF 改善减弱(分别为-0.9±8.7%和 2.3±10.8%,p=0.03)和 LV 每搏量减少(分别为-2±16 毫升/米和 4±10 毫升/米,p=0.015),收缩期肺动脉压降低幅度较小(分别为-1±12 毫米汞柱和-6±10 毫米汞柱,p=0.09),右心室心肌做功指数恶化(分别为-3±17%和 5±26%,p=0.05)。TAVI 后主动脉瓣、二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流程度的差异无统计学意义。总之,TAVI 后植入 PPM 与 LVEF 降低和 LV 卸载受损有关。然而,这种不利的血液动力学反应并不影响 2 年的临床结果。临床获益的维持似乎是由 TAVI 相关的 LV 和右心室功能恢复所驱动的,这减轻了 PPM 的不利影响。