Neurology Department, Curitiba Neurology Institute, Curitiba, Brazil.
Epilepsy Surgery Unit, Curitiba Neurology Institute, Curitiba, Brazil.
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Feb;31:377-80. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
The aim of this study was to investigate not only the effectiveness of epilepsy surgery in improving seizure control but also patient satisfaction with the result of the procedure in a sample of patients operated on at a specialized epilepsy unit.
Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy who had undergone epilepsy surgery (temporal lobectomy/amygdalohippocampectomy) were interviewed in a standardized telephone survey about their satisfaction with the results of the surgery. The morbidity of the surgery was also analyzed retrospectively. The initial study population consisted of 6 amygdalohippocampectomy and 102 temporal lobectomy patients and was reduced to a final sample consisting of 4 amygdalohippocampectomy and 67 lobectomy patients, as the other patients were not available for interview. Surgical results were based on the Engel classification, and satisfaction with the surgery was assessed by asking patients to rate their result and state whether they would make the same decision (to be operated on) again.
A significant number of patients classified as Engel I or II, who considered the surgical outcome good or excellent, said they would have the surgery again (p<0.001). Left temporal lobectomy patients whose results fell in the Engel III/IV bracket were less satisfied (p=0.001) than right temporal lobectomy patients with the same Engel classifications (0.048). Left temporal lobectomy patients who were classified as Engel class III and IV were less likely to have the surgery again if they had the choice (p=0.016).
Patient satisfaction with the results of epilepsy surgery may depend not only on achieving seizure control but also on the temporal lobe resected. Since worse results were associated with lower satisfaction rates only for left temporal resection patients, it is possible that the cognitive consequences of this procedure compound the worse surgical result, leading to decreased satisfaction.
本研究的目的不仅在于调查癫痫手术在改善癫痫控制方面的有效性,还在于调查在专门的癫痫科接受手术的患者样本中,患者对手术结果的满意度。
对接受癫痫手术(颞叶切除术/杏仁核海马切除术)的颞叶癫痫患者进行标准化电话访谈,了解他们对手术结果的满意度。还回顾性分析了手术的发病率。最初的研究人群包括 6 例杏仁核海马切除术和 102 例颞叶切除术患者,由于其他患者无法接受访谈,最终样本减少至 4 例杏仁核海马切除术和 67 例颞叶切除术患者。手术结果基于 Engel 分类,通过询问患者对其结果的评价以及是否会再次做出相同的手术决定来评估手术满意度。
大量被分类为 Engel I 或 II 的患者(认为手术结果良好或优秀)表示他们会再次接受手术(p<0.001)。结果处于 Engel III/IV 类别的左侧颞叶切除术患者的满意度低于具有相同 Engel 分类的右侧颞叶切除术患者(p=0.001)。如果有选择的机会,被分类为 Engel III 和 IV 类的左侧颞叶切除术患者再次接受手术的可能性较小(p=0.016)。
患者对癫痫手术结果的满意度可能不仅取决于是否控制癫痫发作,还取决于切除的颞叶。由于只有左侧颞叶切除术患者的结果较差与满意度较低相关,因此该手术的认知后果可能使手术结果更差,导致满意度降低。