School of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Energy and Environmental system Engineering, University of Seoul, 163 Siripdaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-743, Republic of Korea.
Biomaterials. 2014 Jan;35(4):1109-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.108. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
The raised considerable concerns about the possible environmental health and safety impacts of graphene nanomaterials and their derivatives originated from their potential widespread applications. We performed a comprehensive study about biological interaction of grapheme nanomaterials, specifically in regard to its differential surface functionalization (oxidation status), by using OMICS in graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) treated HepG2 cells. Differential surface chemistry (particularly, oxidation - O/C ratio) modulates hydrophobicity/philicity of GO/rGO which in turn governs their biological interaction potentiality. Similar toxic responses (cytotoxicity, DNA damage, oxidative stress) with differential dose dependency were observed for both GO and rGO but they exhibited distinct mechanism, such as, hydrophilic GO showed cellular uptake, NADPH oxidase dependent ROS formation, high deregulation of antioxidant/DNA repair/apoptosis related genes, conversely, hydrophobic rGO was found to mostly adsorbed at cell surface without internalization, ROS generation by physical interaction, poor gene regulation etc. Global gene expression and pathway analysis displayed that TGFβ1 mediated signaling played the central role in GO induced biological/toxicological effect whereas rGO might elicited host-pathogen (viral) interaction and innate immune response through TLR4-NFkB pathway. In brief, the distinct biological and molecular mechanisms of GO/rGO were attributed to their differential surface oxidation status.
石墨烯纳米材料及其衍生物的广泛应用引起了人们对其可能产生的环境健康和安全影响的极大关注。我们通过对氧化石墨烯(GO)和还原氧化石墨烯(rGO)处理的 HepG2 细胞进行组学研究,全面探讨了石墨烯纳米材料的生物学相互作用,特别是其表面功能化(氧化状态)的差异。不同的表面化学性质(特别是氧化程度-O/C 比)调节了 GO/rGO 的疏水性/亲水性,从而影响了它们的生物学相互作用潜力。GO 和 rGO 均表现出相似的毒性反应(细胞毒性、DNA 损伤、氧化应激),但其剂量依赖性不同,具有不同的机制,如亲水性 GO 表现出细胞摄取、NADPH 氧化酶依赖性 ROS 形成、抗氧化/DNA 修复/凋亡相关基因的高度失调,相反,疏水性 rGO 主要吸附在细胞表面而不内化、通过物理相互作用产生 ROS、基因调控不良等。全基因表达和通路分析显示,TGFβ1 介导的信号通路在 GO 诱导的生物学/毒理学效应中起着核心作用,而 rGO 可能通过 TLR4-NFkB 通路引起宿主-病原体(病毒)相互作用和固有免疫反应。总之,GO/rGO 的不同生物学和分子机制归因于其表面氧化状态的差异。