• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三十年来男男性行为者献血员的延期政策。我们学到了什么?

Three decades of MSM donor deferral policies. What have we learned?

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Administrative Services Building, Room 1009, Box 684, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;18:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2013.09.016
PMID:24211477
Abstract

In the early 1980s, donor deferrals targeting men who have sex with men (MSM) and other high-risk groups were implemented in response to the outbreak of HIV/AIDS. It has now been three decades since the implementation of these deferrals. We review the international experience with developing these policies, which involves combining scientific evidence with ethical and moral concerns and the challenge of moving from precautionary to risk management policies as scientific knowledge and technology evolves. We provide key lessons that can guide blood policymakers as they confront potential new threats to the safety of the blood system and also provide lessons to the wider public health community on how best to incorporate precaution into the policymaking process.

摘要

20 世纪 80 年代初,为应对艾滋病疫情的爆发,针对男男性行为者(MSM)和其他高危人群的献血者延期献血政策开始实施。如今,这些延期献血政策已经实施了三十年。我们回顾了制定这些政策的国际经验,其中涉及将科学证据与伦理道德问题相结合,并在科学知识和技术不断发展的情况下,从预防措施转向风险管理政策的挑战。我们提供了一些关键经验教训,这些经验教训可以为血液政策制定者提供指导,帮助他们应对血液系统安全的潜在新威胁,同时也为更广泛的公共卫生界提供了如何将预防措施纳入政策制定过程的最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Three decades of MSM donor deferral policies. What have we learned?三十年来男男性行为者献血员的延期政策。我们学到了什么?
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;18:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
2
Relative risk of reducing the lifetime blood donation deferral for men who have had sex with men versus currently tolerated transfusion risks.与目前可接受的输血风险相比,减少男男性行为者终身献血延期的相对风险。
Transfus Med Rev. 2011 Jan;25(1):47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2010.08.006.
3
Scientific background on the risk engendered by reducing the lifetime blood donation deferral period for men who have sex with men.关于缩短男男性行为者终身献血延期期限所带来风险的科学背景。
Transfus Med Rev. 2009 Apr;23(2):85-102. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.12.007.
4
Blood donation, deferral, and discrimination: FDA donor deferral policy for men who have sex with men.献血、延期和歧视:FDA 对男男性行为者的献血者延期政策。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Feb;10(2):29-39. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.520590.
5
Men having sex with men donor deferral risk assessment: an analysis using risk management principles.男男性行为者献血延期风险评估:运用风险管理原则的分析
Transfus Med Rev. 2008 Jan;22(1):35-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2007.09.002.
6
Deferral from donating blood of men who have sex with men: impact on the risk of HIV transmission by transfusion in France.男性同性恋者献血的延迟:对法国输血中 HIV 传播风险的影响。
Vox Sang. 2012 Jan;102(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01509.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
7
The rights of blood recipients should supersede any asserted rights of blood donors.受血者的权利应优先于献血者所主张的任何权利。
Vox Sang. 2004 Nov;87(4):280-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00567.x.
8
The ban on blood donation on men who have sex with men: time to rethink and reassess an outdated policy.对与男性发生性关系者的献血禁令:是时候重新思考和重新评估这一过时政策了。
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 8;27:99. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.99.12891. eCollection 2017.
9
Donor deferral policies for men who have sex with men: where are we today?男男性行为者的献血延期政策:我们如今处于什么状况?
Curr Opin Hematol. 2016 Nov;23(6):568-572. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000275.
10
The expressive dimension of donor deferral.献血者延期的表达层面。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Feb;10(2):42-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160903506350.

引用本文的文献

1
Staff perspectives on barriers and enablers to implementing alternative source plasma eligibility criteria for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.工作人员对实施替代来源血浆资格标准的看法,包括对男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性行为的男性的障碍和促进因素。
Transfusion. 2022 Aug;62(8):1571-1582. doi: 10.1111/trf.17000. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Gay and bisexual men's views on reforming blood donation policy in Canada: a qualitative study.男同性恋和双性恋者对加拿大献血政策改革的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7123-4.
3
What is the evidence for the change in the blood -donation deferral period for high-risk groups and does it go far enough?
高危人群献血延期期的改变有何依据?改变幅度是否足够?
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Aug;18(4):304-307. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-4-304.
4
Problems with precaution: the transfusion medicine experience.预防措施的问题:输血医学的经验
J Risk Res. 2019;22(2):137-49. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1351478. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
5
Righting Anachronistic Exclusions: The Ethics of Blood Donation by MSM.纠正不合时宜的排斥:男男性行为者献血的伦理问题
J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2017;29(1):87-90. doi: 10.1080/10538720.2016.1261385. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
The ban on blood donation on men who have sex with men: time to rethink and reassess an outdated policy.对与男性发生性关系者的献血禁令:是时候重新思考和重新评估这一过时政策了。
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 8;27:99. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.99.12891. eCollection 2017.
7
Blood donor deferral policies across Europe and characteristics of men whohave sex with men screened for human immunodeficiency virus in bloodestablishments: data from the European Men-who-have-sex-with-men Internet Survey (EMIS).欧洲各地的献血者暂缓政策和在血液机构中筛查人类免疫缺陷病毒的男男性行为者的特征:来自欧洲男男性接触者互联网调查(EMIS)的数据。
Blood Transfus. 2018 Jan;16(1):7-16. doi: 10.2450/2017.0109-16. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
The use of preliminary scientific evidence in public health: a case study of XMRV.初步科学证据在公共卫生中的应用:以 XMRV 为例。
PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 8;11(4):e1001623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001623. eCollection 2014 Apr.