University of the Americas, Puebla, Mexico.
Mem Cognit. 1974 Mar;2(2):215-8. doi: 10.3758/BF03208985.
Each of 144 Ss learned two verbal discrimination (VD) lists for six trials. Two levels of percentage occurrence of response members (100% or 50%) were combined factorially with two methods of presentation and three transfer paradigms (C1-I2, C2-I1, C2-I2). In first-list learning, with one method of presentation in the 50,% ORM entire list was presented with only half the correct (C) items designated on each study trial, while in the second method only half the list was presented with all C items underlined. There were no differences between the two methods in the 100% ORM condition. The results indicated that % ORM was a significant variable in first-list learning, supporting the findings of Newby and Young (1972). No effect was found for method of presentation. Also, no real significant effect of these two variables was found in VD transfer. All results were interpreted in terms of the frequency theory of VD learning.
144 名被试者每人学习两个言语辨别(VD)列表,每个列表进行六次试验。分别以两种呈现方式和三种转移范式(C1-I2、C2-I1、C2-I2)将响应成员的百分比出现率(100%或 50%)两个水平进行了析因组合。在第一列表学习中,在 50% ORM 中,一种呈现方式将整个列表呈现出来,每次学习试验只指定一半的正确(C)项目;而在第二种方法中,只有一半的列表呈现出来,所有 C 项目都用下划线标记。在 100% ORM 条件下,这两种方法没有差异。结果表明,%ORM 是第一列表学习中的一个重要变量,支持了 Newby 和 Young(1972)的发现。呈现方式没有效果。在 VD 转移中,这两个变量也没有真正显著的效果。所有结果都根据 VD 学习的频率理论进行了解释。