KU Leuven (Belgium).
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E84. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.84.
Non-specificity of fear is a core aspect of what makes anxiety disorders so impairing: Fear does not remain specific to a single stimulus paired with danger, but generalizes to a broad set of stimuli, resulting in a snowballing of threat signals. The blocking procedure can provide a valuable laboratory model for gaining insight into such threat appraisal and generalization processes. We report two experiments in which we induced selective threat appraisal by using a blocking procedure in human aversive conditioning. We subsequently assessed to what extent such selective threat appraisal is sensitive to different kinds of interference. Results illustrate that the maintenance of selective threat appraisal is not guaranteed: Stimuli present during an aversive conditioning event that are initially tagged with a low threat value, can come to be tagged with a higher threat value later on, without additional experience with these stimuli. We argue that such interference in selective threat appraisal might be one of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of non-specific fear.
恐惧不会仍然局限于与危险配对的单一刺激,而是会泛化到广泛的刺激,从而导致威胁信号的滚雪球效应。阻断程序可以为深入了解这种威胁评估和泛化过程提供有价值的实验室模型。我们报告了两项实验,在这些实验中,我们通过在人类厌恶条件作用中使用阻断程序来诱导选择性威胁评估。随后,我们评估了这种选择性威胁评估在多大程度上对不同类型的干扰敏感。结果表明,选择性威胁评估的维持并非是有保证的:在最初被标记为低威胁值的厌恶条件作用事件中出现的刺激,以后可能会被标记为更高的威胁值,而无需对这些刺激进行额外的体验。我们认为,选择性威胁评估中的这种干扰可能是导致非特异性恐惧发病机制的机制之一。