• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架:现状如何?

Drug-eluting versus bare-metal coronary stents: where are we now?

机构信息

Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Nov;1(6):501-8. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.64.

DOI:10.2217/cer.12.64
PMID:24236469
Abstract

Drug-eluting stents have dramatically reduced the risk of restenosis, but concerns of an increased risk of stent thrombosis have provided uncertainty about their use. Recent studies have continued to show improved procedural and clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents both in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Newer generation drug-eluting stents (especially everolimus-eluting stents) have been shown to be not only efficacious but also safe with reduced risk of stent thrombosis when compared with bare-metal stents, potentially changing the benchmark for stent safety from bare-metal stents to everolimus-eluting stents. While much progress is being made in the development of bioabsorbable polymer stents, nonpolymer stents and bioabsorbable stent technology, it remains to be seen whether these stents will have superior safety and efficacy outcomes compared with the already much improved rates of revascularization and stent thrombosis seen with newer generation stents (everolimus-eluting stents and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents).

摘要

药物洗脱支架显著降低了再狭窄的风险,但支架血栓形成风险增加的担忧使得其应用存在不确定性。最近的研究继续表明,在急性冠状动脉综合征和稳定型冠状动脉疾病的治疗中,药物洗脱支架在改善手术和临床结果方面具有优势。新一代药物洗脱支架(尤其是依维莫司洗脱支架)不仅有效,而且与金属裸支架相比,支架血栓形成的风险降低,这可能改变了支架安全性的基准,从金属裸支架变为依维莫司洗脱支架。虽然在生物可吸收聚合物支架、非聚合物支架和生物可吸收支架技术的开发方面取得了很大进展,但这些支架是否具有优于新一代支架(依维莫司洗脱支架和 Resolute zotarolimus 洗脱支架)的安全性和有效性结果,还有待观察(已经大大提高了血运重建和支架血栓形成的发生率)。

相似文献

1
Drug-eluting versus bare-metal coronary stents: where are we now?药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架:现状如何?
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Nov;1(6):501-8. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.64.
2
Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.生物可吸收聚合物与耐用聚合物载药及裸金属支架的临床疗效:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.061. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
3
Outcomes with various drug-eluting or bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a mixed treatment comparison analysis of trial level data from 34 068 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,不同药物洗脱支架或金属裸支架的结局:来自随机试验 34068 患者年随访的试验水平数据的混合治疗比较分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):378-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000415. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
4
4-year clinical outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents: a report from the RESOLUTE All-Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).新型药物洗脱支架治疗患者的 4 年临床结果和再次血运重建的预测因素:RESOLUTE 所有患者试验的报告(一种新型佐他莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机比较)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 29;63(16):1617-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.036. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架的短期和长期结果:来自随机试验的 117762 患者年随访的混合治疗比较分析。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2873-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097014. Epub 2012 May 14.
6
Coating bioabsorption and chronic bare metal scaffolding versus fully bioabsorbable stent.涂层生物吸收和慢性裸金属支架与完全生物可吸收支架。
EuroIntervention. 2009 Dec 15;5 Suppl F:F36-42. doi: 10.4244/EIJV5IFA6.
7
Drug-eluting coronary stents: many meta-analyses, little benefit.药物洗脱冠状动脉支架:众多荟萃分析,获益寥寥。
Prescrire Int. 2009 Apr;18(100):70-4.
8
Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最新进展:药物洗脱支架的演变,聚焦于XIENCE V药物洗脱支架。
Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328333f550.
9
Long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的长期预后。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Feb;10(1):49-61. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.1.
10
[Expectation for new-generation drug eluting stents].[对新一代药物洗脱支架的期望]
Nihon Rinsho. 2011 Feb;69(2):237-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease.稳定型冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效益建模
World J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 26;7(10):594-602. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i10.594.