Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Kardiologische Praxis und Praxisklinik, Munich, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 29;63(16):1617-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.036. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
The aim of the study was to investigate 4-year outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) and XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois) in the RESOLUTE (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) All-Comers trial.
Data on long-term outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents are limited, and predictors of repeat revascularization due to restenosis and/or progression of disease are largely unknown.
Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with the R-ZES (n = 1,140) or the EES (n = 1,152). We assessed pre-specified safety and efficacy outcomes at 4 years including target lesion failure and stent thrombosis. Predictors of revascularization at 4 years were identified by Cox regression analysis.
At 4 years, the rates of target lesion failure (15.2% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.68), cardiac death (5.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.44), and target vessel myocardial infarction (5.3% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.00), clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.62), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.23) were similar with the R-ZES and EES. Independent predictors of TLR were age, insulin-treated diabetes, SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, treatment of saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, and in-stent restenosis. Independent predictors of any revascularization were age, diabetes, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, absence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, smaller reference vessel diameter, SYNTAX score, and treatment of left anterior descending, right coronary artery, saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, or in-stent restenosis.
R-ZES and EES demonstrated similar safety and efficacy throughout 4 years. TLR represented less than one-half of all repeat revascularization procedures. Patient- and lesion-related factors predicting the risk of TLR and any revascularization showed considerable overlap. (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084).
本研究旨在探讨 RESOLUTE(随机比较紫杉醇洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用)全分析人群试验中,接受 Resolute zotarolimus-eluting 支架(R-ZES)(美敦力,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)和依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)(雅培血管,伊利诺伊州雅培公园)治疗的患者 4 年时的再血管化结果和再血管化的预测因素。
新一代药物洗脱支架的长期结果数据有限,且由于再狭窄和/或疾病进展导致再血管化的预测因素在很大程度上尚不清楚。
患者被随机分配接受 R-ZES(n = 1140)或 EES(n = 1152)治疗。我们在 4 年时评估了预先指定的安全性和疗效结局,包括靶病变失败和支架血栓形成。通过 Cox 回归分析确定 4 年时再血管化的预测因素。
4 年时,靶病变失败率(15.2% vs. 14.6%,p = 0.68)、心脏死亡(5.4% vs. 4.7%,p = 0.44)和靶血管心肌梗死(5.3% vs. 5.4%,p = 1.00)、临床指示的靶病变血运重建(TLR)(7.0% vs. 6.5%,p = 0.62)和明确/可能的支架血栓形成(2.3% vs. 1.6%,p = 0.23)在 R-ZES 和 EES 之间相似。TLR 的独立预测因素为年龄、胰岛素治疗的糖尿病、SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与 Taxus 和心脏手术的协同作用)评分、隐静脉桥的治疗、开口病变和支架内再狭窄。任何再血管化的独立预测因素为年龄、糖尿病、先前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死、参考血管直径较小、SYNTAX 评分以及左前降支、右冠状动脉、隐静脉桥、开口病变或支架内再狭窄的治疗。
R-ZES 和 EES 在 4 年期间表现出相似的安全性和疗效。TLR 不到所有再血管化手术的一半。预测 TLR 和任何再血管化风险的患者和病变相关因素存在相当大的重叠。(随机比较紫杉醇洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用[RESOLUTE-AC];NCT00617084)。