Li Na, Xie Qiu-fei, Lin Ye
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;48(8):458-61.
To measure passive tactile threshold of implant-supported single crowns (ISSC) in six orthogonal orientations, to analyze impact factors, and to guide the occlusal adjustment in a personalized manner.
The passive tactile thresholds of 24 implant-supported single crowns (5 maxillary anterior teeth, 7 maxillary posterior teeth and 12 mandibular posterior teeth) from 19 ISSC patients (8 men and 11 women, from 25 years old to 56 years old) were measured in six orthogonal orientations (four horizontal orientations of labial or buccal, lingual, mesial and distal, and two axial orientations of apical and coronal) using a digital test system for tactile function of teeth.SPSS 19.0 for windows was used to analyze impact factors, using double-sided test, with a significance level of 0.05. Paired-samples t test was used to test the difference between implant-supported single crowns and the controlled natural teeth, and between different time points. One-way ANOVA was used to test the difference between different orientations, maxilla-mandibular anterior-posterior, and men-women.
The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC and control teeth were (1282 ± 709) and (40 ± 40) mN respectively. The difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.001). The passive tactile thresholds of buccal-lingual, mesial-distal and axial of ISSC were (1334 ± 696), (1102 ± 605) and (1412 ± 791) mN respectively, of which, the difference between mesial-distal and axial was of statistical significance (P < 0.05). The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC of maxillary anterior teeth, posterior teeth and mandibular posterior teeth were (1003 ± 616), (1302 ± 620) and (1386 ± 769) mN respectively, of which, the difference between maxillary anterior teeth and posterior teeth was of statistical significance (P < 0.05). The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC of men and women were (1751 ± 784) and (946 ± 393) mN respectively, the difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.001). The passive tactile thresholds of ISSC of one-week and one-month after wearing the teeth were (1421 ± 826) and (1411 ± 814) mN respectively, the difference was of no statistical significance (P > 0.05).
The passive tactile threshold of ISSC was more than 65 times as much as that of the natural teeth. There was statistical significance between different orientations, between maxillary anterior and posterior teeth, and between men and women. No statistical significance was found between maxillary and madibular posterior teeth and between one-week and one-month after wearing the teeth.
测量种植单冠(ISSC)在六个正交方向上的被动触觉阈值,分析影响因素,并以个性化方式指导咬合调整。
使用牙齿触觉功能数字测试系统,对19例ISSC患者(8例男性和11例女性,年龄25岁至56岁)的24颗种植单冠(5颗上颌前牙、7颗上颌后牙和12颗下颌后牙)在六个正交方向(唇侧或颊侧、舌侧、近中、远中四个水平方向,以及根尖和冠方两个轴向)进行被动触觉阈值测量。使用Windows版SPSS 19.0分析影响因素,采用双侧检验,显著性水平为0.05。配对样本t检验用于检验种植单冠与对照天然牙之间以及不同时间点之间的差异。单因素方差分析用于检验不同方向、上颌与下颌前牙与后牙以及男性与女性之间的差异。
ISSC和对照牙的被动触觉阈值分别为(1282±709)mN和(40±40)mN。差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。ISSC颊舌向、近远中向和轴向的被动触觉阈值分别为(1334±696)mN、(1102±605)mN和(1412±791)mN,其中近远中向与轴向之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。上颌前牙、后牙和下颌后牙ISSC的被动触觉阈值分别为(1003±616)mN、(1302±620)mN和(1386±769)mN,其中上颌前牙与后牙之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。男性和女性ISSC的被动触觉阈值分别为(1751±784)mN和(946±393)mN,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。戴牙后1周和1个月ISSC的被动触觉阈值分别为(1421±826)mN和(1411±814)mN,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
ISSC的被动触觉阈值是天然牙的65倍以上。不同方向之间、上颌前牙与后牙之间以及男性与女性之间存在统计学意义。上颌与下颌后牙之间以及戴牙后1周和1个月之间未发现统计学意义。