Suppr超能文献

感染性腹主动脉下段人造血管切除及再血管化术后的再感染。

Reinfection after resection and revascularization of infected infrarenal abdominal aortic grafts.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex; Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Tex.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar;59(3):684-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in perioperative care, long-term and amputation-free survival rates are poor after resection of infected abdominal aortic grafts. We reviewed our cases to determine the rate of reinfection and risk factors for mortality and limb loss.

METHODS

We reviewed cases with infrarenal aortic graft infection from 1999 to 2013. Cases requiring graft excision were included for analysis. Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic grafts were excluded. Reconstruction types included both extra-anatomic and in situ grafts. Patient comorbidities, surgical outcomes, and known reinfection rates were assessed. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients had resection of infected infrarenal abdominal aortic grafts during the study period. Most patients (26/28; 93%) had infected aortoiliac or aortofemoral prosthetic bypass grafts, but two of 28 patients had infected endovascular aortoiliac stent grafts. The median age was 69 years (range, 46-86 years), with 68% men and 32% women. Aortoenteric fistulae or graft-enteric erosions were noted in 12 of 28 (43%) patients at operation. There were 79% of patients who had in situ reconstruction, including 4 (14%) with polyester, 1 (4%) with polytetrafluoroethylene, 3 (11%) with cadaveric homograft, 3 (11%) with composite grafts, and 11 (39%) with native femoropopliteal vein grafts. Five (18%) patients had extra-anatomic bypass and one had excision without revascularization. In-hospital mortality after initial graft excision and revascularization occurred in two (7%) patients. Seven (25%) patients had evidence of reinfection after a median of 20 months, of whom five underwent reintervention with two additional in-hospital deaths. All in-hospital deaths occurred in patients with graft-enteric contamination. Overall limb salvage and survival at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years were 82% and 46%, respectively, and did not differ among revascularization types (P = .85 and .74). One-year amputation-free survival was 47% overall. Three patients with native femoropopliteal vein graft repair required amputation in follow-up. Diabetes was the only observed risk factor for amputation (P = .05). Risks for mortality included history of cerebrovascular disease (P = .05) and shock on presentation (P = .04). No other comorbid condition, type of revascularization, or perioperative complication was associated with limb loss or mortality on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Revascularization after excision of infected abdominal aortic grafts can be done with acceptable in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Reinfection is problematic, regardless of revascularization conduit, and is associated with limb loss and death. New and aggressive local anti-infective strategies are warranted.

摘要

目的

尽管围手术期护理有所进步,但感染性腹主动脉移植物切除术后的长期和免于截肢的存活率仍较差。我们回顾了我们的病例,以确定再感染的发生率以及与死亡率和肢体丧失相关的危险因素。

方法

我们回顾了 1999 年至 2013 年期间患有肾下主动脉移植物感染的病例。包括需要切除移植物的病例进行分析。排除胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉移植物。重建类型包括解剖外和原位移植物。评估患者合并症、手术结果和已知的再感染率。进行单变量和 Kaplan-Meier 分析。

结果

在研究期间,有 28 例患者接受了感染性肾下腹主动脉移植物切除。大多数患者(26/28;93%)有感染性腹主动脉或股动脉假体旁路移植,但是 28 例中有 2 例有感染性腹主动脉腔内支架移植物。中位年龄为 69 岁(范围,46-86 岁),68%为男性,32%为女性。28 例中有 12 例(43%)在手术时发现有主动脉肠瘘或移植物-肠侵蚀。有 79%的患者进行了原位重建,包括 4 例(14%)使用聚酯,1 例(4%)使用聚四氟乙烯,3 例(11%)使用尸体同种异体移植物,3 例(11%)使用复合移植物,11 例(39%)使用自体股腘静脉移植物。5 例(18%)患者行解剖外旁路移植,1 例无再血管化。初始移植物切除和再血管化后,有 2 例(7%)患者发生院内死亡。在中位时间为 20 个月后,有 7 例(25%)患者出现再感染证据,其中 5 例接受了再次介入治疗,并有 2 例额外的院内死亡。所有院内死亡均发生在有移植物-肠污染的患者中。平均随访 2.5 年时,总体肢体存活率和生存率分别为 82%和 46%,不同的血管重建类型之间无差异(P=0.85 和 0.74)。总体 1 年无截肢生存率为 47%。3 例接受自体股腘静脉移植物修复的患者在随访中需要截肢。糖尿病是唯一观察到的截肢风险因素(P=0.05)。死亡率的危险因素包括脑血管疾病病史(P=0.05)和就诊时休克(P=0.04)。单变量分析未发现其他合并症、血管重建类型或围手术期并发症与肢体丧失或死亡率相关。

结论

感染性腹主动脉移植物切除术后的再血管化可获得可接受的院内发病率和死亡率。再感染是一个问题,无论血管重建的途径如何,都与肢体丧失和死亡相关。需要新的和积极的局部抗感染策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验