• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机指令对提升能力测量的影响:安全性、可靠性和有效性。

Effect of computerized instructions on measurement of lift capacity: Safety, reliability, and validity.

机构信息

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 1993 Jun;3(2):65-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01078160.

DOI:10.1007/BF01078160
PMID:24243227
Abstract

The evaluation of lift capacity is an important part of most functional capacity evaluations. Several different methods have been developed to evaluate lift capacity in a safe, reliable, and valid manner. Isometric strength testing is one approach which has been demonstrated to be highly reliable. However, questions have been raised about the safety and validity of isometric strength testing as a predictor of "real world" lift capacity. One method to improve safety is to provide real time performance feedback so that the evaluee is able to increase psychophysical input to appropriately gauge his or her effort level. One method to improve reliability is to provide standardized instructions that are well understood by the evaluee. Both of these approaches have been utilized in the ERGOS Work Simulator, a computer-controlled multiple-task evaluation instrument that presents visual and auditory instructions to the evaluee along with "real-time" performance feedback. The safety, reliability, and validity of this computer-automated approach in comparison to an experienced human evaluator was evaluated in this research project. The results of this study demonstrate the efficacy of computerized instructions in an isometric strength testing system to achieve safe, reliable, and valid results. Intra-task variability may be improved by providing pre-test practice trials.

摘要

提升能力的评估是大多数功能能力评估的重要组成部分。已经开发出几种不同的方法,以安全、可靠和有效的方式评估提升能力。等长力量测试是一种已被证明具有高度可靠性的方法。然而,人们对等长力量测试作为“真实世界”提升能力预测指标的安全性和有效性提出了质疑。提高安全性的一种方法是提供实时性能反馈,以便评估者能够增加心理物理输入,以适当衡量他或她的努力水平。提高可靠性的一种方法是提供标准化的说明,以便评估者能够很好地理解。这两种方法都已在 ERGOS 工作模拟器中得到应用,该模拟器是一种计算机控制的多任务评估仪器,它向评估者呈现视觉和听觉说明以及“实时”性能反馈。在这项研究项目中,评估了这种计算机自动化方法与经验丰富的人类评估员相比的安全性、可靠性和有效性。这项研究的结果表明,在等长力量测试系统中,计算机化指令在实现安全、可靠和有效结果方面是有效的。通过提供预测试练习试验,可以提高任务内变异性。

相似文献

1
Effect of computerized instructions on measurement of lift capacity: Safety, reliability, and validity.计算机指令对提升能力测量的影响:安全性、可靠性和有效性。
J Occup Rehabil. 1993 Jun;3(2):65-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01078160.
2
Age and gender normative data for lift capacity.举重能力的年龄和性别规范数据。
Work. 2014;49(2):257-69. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131671.
3
A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 1--Development and reliability testing.一项测量身体有缺陷成年人举重能力的测试。第1部分——开发与可靠性测试。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Oct 1;20(19):2119-29. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00010.
4
Concurrent validity of the ERGOS work simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a workers' compensation population.ERGOS工作模拟器与传统功能能力评估技术在工伤赔偿人群中的同时效度。
J Occup Med. 1993 Aug;35(8):759-67. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199308000-00011.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population.EPIC举重能力测试中真诚努力指标对既往受伤人群的敏感性和特异性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1405-12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00013.
6
Fixed Handheld Dynamometry Provides Reliable and Valid Values for Quadriceps Isometric Strength in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Study.固定手持测力计可为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者提供可靠和有效的股四头肌等长力量值:一项多中心研究。
Phys Ther. 2019 Sep 1;99(9):1255-1267. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz059.
7
Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004 Nov;77(8):527-37. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0549-7. Epub 2004 Nov 9.
8
Factors affecting reliability and validity of self-directed automatic in situ audiometry: implications for self-fitting hearing AIDS.影响自我导向自动原位听力测定可靠性和有效性的因素:对自行适配助听器的启示
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):5-18. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.1.2.
9
Validity and reliability of an instrumented leg-extension machine for measuring isometric muscle strength of the knee extensors.一种用于测量膝关节伸肌等长肌力的器械化腿部伸展机的效度和信度。
J Sport Rehabil. 2015 May 20;24(2). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0122. Print 2015 May 1.
10
Performance-integrated self-report measurement of physical ability.体能综合自评测量。
Spine J. 2010 May;10(5):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The concurrent validity of the ERGOS Work Simulator and the Ergo-Kit with respect to maximum lifting capacity.ERGOS工作模拟器和人体工程学套件在最大举升能力方面的同时效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Jun;14(2):107-18. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000018327.27554.58.

本文引用的文献

1
The reliability and validity of two new tests of maximum lifting capacity.两种新的最大举重能力测试的可靠性和有效性。
J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Mar;1(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01073277.
2
A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capability.等长肌力与动态举重能力的比较。
Ergonomics. 1980 Jan;23(1):13-27. doi: 10.1080/00140138008924714.
3
Dynamic strength test as a predictor for maximal and acceptable lifting.动态力量测试作为最大和可接受举重能力的预测指标。
Ergonomics. 1981 Sep;24(9):663-72. doi: 10.1080/00140138108924889.
4
An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability.一种评估个体举重能力的等惯性技术。
Hum Factors. 1983 Oct;25(5):493-506. doi: 10.1177/001872088302500504.
5
The psychophysical approach in manual lifting--a verification study.手动搬运中的心理物理学方法——一项验证研究。
Hum Factors. 1983 Oct;25(5):485-91. doi: 10.1177/001872088302500503.
6
Maximum acceptable weight of lift.最大可接受起重量。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1967 Jul-Aug;28(4):322-9. doi: 10.1080/00028896709342530.
7
A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.一种静态肌肉力量测试的拟议标准程序。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1974 Apr;35(4):201-6. doi: 10.1080/0002889748507023.
8
Determination of lifting abilities: a comparative study of four techniques.举重能力的测定:四种技术的比较研究
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Dec;48(12):951-6. doi: 10.1080/15298668791385895.
9
Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.等速和等惯性举重测试作为最大举重能力预测指标的比较。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(2):146-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00640654.
10
Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. I. A standardized protocol and normative database.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Sep;13(9):993-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198809000-00005.