Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, İstanbul, Turkey.
J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):364-73. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12379. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
The diagnostic criteria of sexual dysfunctions (SDs) are paramount for the development of sexual medicine as reliable diagnoses are essential to guide treatment plans. Prior Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classifications based definitions of SD mostly on expert opinions and included imprecise terms. The validity of diagnoses of SD has only recently been challenged, and efforts are made to make more operational definitions.
This paper aims to compare and contrast the recently released Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria of SD with that of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) and explains the rationale for making changes in the new DSM-5. It also aims to address some issues to be considered further for the future.
Online proposed American Psychiatric Association website DSM-5, the new released DSM-5, and DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for SD were thoroughly inspected, and an extensive literature search was performed for comparative reasons.
Changes in diagnostic criteria of DSM-5 were detected, and DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for SD were compared and contrasted.
Diagnostic criteria were more operationalized, and explicit duration and frequency criteria were set up in DSM-5 for purposes of good clinical research. Classifications based on simple linear sexual response were abandoned, and diagnostic classifications were separately made for males and females. Desire and arousal disorders in women were merged.
Drifting apart from linear sexual response cycle may be an advancement in establishing specific diagnostic criteria for different genders. However, it is still a question of debate whether there is enough evidence to lump sexual interest and arousal disorders in females. Making more precise definitions is important to differentiate disorders from other transient conditions. However, there is still room to improve our definitions and find a way to include gay and lesbian individuals. Further discussions and debates are expected to be continued in the future.
性障碍(SD)的诊断标准对于性医学的发展至关重要,因为可靠的诊断对于指导治疗计划至关重要。之前的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)分类主要基于专家意见来定义 SD,其中包含不精确的术语。SD 的诊断有效性最近才受到质疑,目前正在努力制定更具操作性的定义。
本文旨在比较和对比最近发布的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版》(DSM-5)SD 诊断标准与《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版文本修订版》(DSM-IV-TR)的诊断标准,并解释在新的 DSM-5 中做出更改的理由。它还旨在解决未来需要进一步考虑的一些问题。
仔细检查了在线发布的美国精神病学协会网站 DSM-5、新发布的 DSM-5 和 DSM-IV-TR 的 SD 诊断标准,并进行了广泛的文献检索进行比较。
检测 DSM-5 的诊断标准变化,并比较和对比 DSM-IV-TR 和 DSM-5 的 SD 诊断标准。
诊断标准更加具体化,DSM-5 为了良好的临床研究目的设置了明确的持续时间和频率标准。放弃了基于简单线性性反应的分类,分别为男性和女性制定了诊断分类。女性的欲望和唤起障碍合并。
与线性性反应周期脱钩可能是为不同性别建立特定诊断标准的进步。然而,是否有足够的证据将女性的性兴趣和唤起障碍归为一类仍然存在争议。制定更精确的定义对于将障碍与其他短暂情况区分开来很重要。然而,仍有改进我们的定义并找到一种方法将同性恋者包括在内的空间。预计未来将继续进行进一步的讨论和辩论。