Chang Po-Cheng, Wo Hung-Ta, Chen Tien-Hsing, Wu Delon, Lin Fen-Chiung, Wang Chun-Chieh
Second Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;37(4):454-63. doi: 10.1111/pace.12291. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
This study examined factors that could predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade in patients who developed heart failure (HF) after long-term right ventricular (RV) pacing.
Twenty-five consecutive patients who received CRT upgrade for long-term RV pacing (RVP) were enrolled in this study. None of these patients were eligible for CRT at the moment of starting RVP. After 5.7 ± 4.0 years chronic RVP, these 25 patients developed HF symptoms and received CRT upgrade. Echocardiography was conducted at the moment of CRT upgrade and 6 months after CRT. Remote past left ventricular ejection fraction (RP-LVEF) at the moment of starting RVP was retrospectively obtained from the echocardiographic and cardiac catherization reports. Responders were defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥ 15%. Their clinical and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed and compared.
Responders had significant higher RP-LVEF as compared to nonresponders (53.6 ± 16.5% vs 31.4 ± 11.6%, P = 0.002). RP-LVEF correlated with reduction in LVESV after CRT upgrade (P < 0.001). RP-LVEF ≥ 43.5% as a cutoff value predicted response to CRT upgrade with an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.87, a sensitivity of 78%, and a specificity of 100%. Intrinsic QRS width, septal-posterior wall motion delay, or tissue Doppler-derived dyssynchrony indexes did not predict responses to CRT upgrade.
In long-term RVP patients who developed HF and received CRT upgrade, RP-LVEF ≥ 43.5% predicts good response. Conventional dyssynchrony indexes do not predict responses to CRT upgrade in these patients.
本研究探讨了长期右心室(RV)起搏后发生心力衰竭(HF)的患者对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)升级反应的预测因素。
本研究纳入了25例因长期RV起搏(RVP)而接受CRT升级的连续患者。这些患者在开始RVP时均不符合CRT标准。经过5.7±4.0年的慢性RVP后,这25例患者出现HF症状并接受了CRT升级。在CRT升级时及CRT后6个月进行超声心动图检查。从超声心动图和心脏导管检查报告中回顾性获取开始RVP时的既往左心室射血分数(RP-LVEF)。反应者定义为左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)减少≥15%。分析并比较他们的临床和超声心动图参数。
与无反应者相比,反应者的RP-LVEF显著更高(53.6±16.5%对31.4±11.6%,P = 0.002)。RP-LVEF与CRT升级后LVESV的减少相关(P < 0.001)。以RP-LVEF≥43.5%为截断值预测CRT升级反应,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.87,敏感性为78%,特异性为100%。固有QRS波宽度、室间隔-后壁运动延迟或组织多普勒衍生的不同步指数不能预测CRT升级反应。
在长期RVP且发生HF并接受CRT升级的患者中,RP-LVEF≥43.5%预测反应良好。传统的不同步指数不能预测这些患者对CRT升级的反应。