Ye Huiming, Chen Falin, Yan Shuidi, Zhang Yan, Fang Zanxi, Su Xiaosong, Cai Weicheng, Zhang Zhongying
Translational Medicine Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University , Xiamen, Fujian , P. R. China.
Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;24(4):580-4. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.844386. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
The automatic anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies assay offered great advantages over traditional methods in terms of improved precision, reliability, technical simplicity, short turnaround time and high-speed throughput. In this study, we evaluated the main technical performance and diagnostic accuracy of the first automatic anti-CCP assay approved in China.
The study comprised 106 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, 203 non-RA rheumatic disease controls and 46 healthy persons. Anti-CCP, rheumatoid factor (RF), α1-acid glycoprotein, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were measured and compared. The precision, reference intervals for Chinese population and cut-off value for RA diagnosis, as well as the suitable diluent for anti-CCP were assessed. The positive rate and score of anti-CCP were compared with RF and acute-phase reactants, according to the new RA criteria.
Within- and between-run imprecision, expressed as the coefficient of variation, were 0.47-1.36% and 1.15-2.63%, respectively. Upper 95% reference limit of anti-CCP in healthy Chinese was 8.8 U/mL. The area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) for anti-CCP and RF were 0.882 (95% CI 0.833-0.930) and 0.844 (95% CI 0.792-0.897), respectively. Based on the cut-off value set by ROC, compared to RF, anti-CCP had higher sensitivity (96.8% vs. 78.3%) and specificity (90.9% vs. 70.7%). With 17 U/mL set as the optimal cut-off for anti-CCP, the total positivity of anti-CCP was comparable to that of RF (76.4% vs. 75.5%), but the high-positivity rate of anti-CCP was significantly higher (74.5% vs. 62.3%, p < 0.005).
Our results confirm anti-CCP as a more sensitive and specific marker than RF for the diagnosis of RA. The diagnostic performance of the Elecsys anti-CCP assay makes it a useful adjunct to clinical practice in the Chinese population.
与传统方法相比,自动抗环瓜氨酸肽(anti-CCP)抗体检测在提高精密度、可靠性、技术简便性、缩短周转时间和高通量方面具有很大优势。在本研究中,我们评估了中国批准的首个自动抗CCP检测的主要技术性能和诊断准确性。
该研究包括106例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者、203例非RA风湿性疾病对照者和46例健康人。检测并比较抗CCP、类风湿因子(RF)、α1-酸性糖蛋白、C反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率。评估精密度、中国人群的参考区间、RA诊断的临界值以及抗CCP的合适稀释剂。根据新的RA标准,比较抗CCP的阳性率和评分与RF及急性期反应物。
批内和批间不精密度,以变异系数表示,分别为0.47 - 1.36%和1.15 - 2.63%。健康中国人群中抗CCP的95%参考上限为8.8 U/mL。抗CCP和RF的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积分别为0.882(95%CI 0.833 - 0.930)和0.844(95%CI 0.792 - 0.897)。基于ROC设定的临界值,与RF相比,抗CCP具有更高的敏感性(96.8%对78.3%)和特异性(90.9%对70.7%)。将17 U/mL设定为抗CCP的最佳临界值,抗CCP的总阳性率与RF相当(76.4%对75.5%),但抗CCP的高阳性率显著更高(74.5%对62.3%,p < 0.005)。
我们的结果证实,与RF相比,抗CCP是诊断RA更敏感和特异的标志物。Elecsys抗CCP检测的诊断性能使其成为中国人群临床实践中的有用辅助手段。