Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者中Elecsys抗环瓜氨酸肽检测的诊断效用

Diagnostic utility of the Elecsys anti-CCP assay in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Ye Huiming, Chen Falin, Yan Shuidi, Zhang Yan, Fang Zanxi, Su Xiaosong, Cai Weicheng, Zhang Zhongying

机构信息

Translational Medicine Research Center, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University , Xiamen, Fujian , P. R. China.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;24(4):580-4. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.844386. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The automatic anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies assay offered great advantages over traditional methods in terms of improved precision, reliability, technical simplicity, short turnaround time and high-speed throughput. In this study, we evaluated the main technical performance and diagnostic accuracy of the first automatic anti-CCP assay approved in China.

METHODS

The study comprised 106 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, 203 non-RA rheumatic disease controls and 46 healthy persons. Anti-CCP, rheumatoid factor (RF), α1-acid glycoprotein, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were measured and compared. The precision, reference intervals for Chinese population and cut-off value for RA diagnosis, as well as the suitable diluent for anti-CCP were assessed. The positive rate and score of anti-CCP were compared with RF and acute-phase reactants, according to the new RA criteria.

RESULTS

Within- and between-run imprecision, expressed as the coefficient of variation, were 0.47-1.36% and 1.15-2.63%, respectively. Upper 95% reference limit of anti-CCP in healthy Chinese was 8.8 U/mL. The area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) for anti-CCP and RF were 0.882 (95% CI 0.833-0.930) and 0.844 (95% CI 0.792-0.897), respectively. Based on the cut-off value set by ROC, compared to RF, anti-CCP had higher sensitivity (96.8% vs. 78.3%) and specificity (90.9% vs. 70.7%). With 17 U/mL set as the optimal cut-off for anti-CCP, the total positivity of anti-CCP was comparable to that of RF (76.4% vs. 75.5%), but the high-positivity rate of anti-CCP was significantly higher (74.5% vs. 62.3%, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm anti-CCP as a more sensitive and specific marker than RF for the diagnosis of RA. The diagnostic performance of the Elecsys anti-CCP assay makes it a useful adjunct to clinical practice in the Chinese population.

摘要

目的

与传统方法相比,自动抗环瓜氨酸肽(anti-CCP)抗体检测在提高精密度、可靠性、技术简便性、缩短周转时间和高通量方面具有很大优势。在本研究中,我们评估了中国批准的首个自动抗CCP检测的主要技术性能和诊断准确性。

方法

该研究包括106例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者、203例非RA风湿性疾病对照者和46例健康人。检测并比较抗CCP、类风湿因子(RF)、α1-酸性糖蛋白、C反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率。评估精密度、中国人群的参考区间、RA诊断的临界值以及抗CCP的合适稀释剂。根据新的RA标准,比较抗CCP的阳性率和评分与RF及急性期反应物。

结果

批内和批间不精密度,以变异系数表示,分别为0.47 - 1.36%和1.15 - 2.63%。健康中国人群中抗CCP的95%参考上限为8.8 U/mL。抗CCP和RF的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积分别为0.882(95%CI 0.833 - 0.930)和0.844(95%CI 0.792 - 0.897)。基于ROC设定的临界值,与RF相比,抗CCP具有更高的敏感性(96.8%对78.3%)和特异性(90.9%对70.7%)。将17 U/mL设定为抗CCP的最佳临界值,抗CCP的总阳性率与RF相当(76.4%对75.5%),但抗CCP的高阳性率显著更高(74.5%对62.3%,p < 0.005)。

结论

我们的结果证实,与RF相比,抗CCP是诊断RA更敏感和特异的标志物。Elecsys抗CCP检测的诊断性能使其成为中国人群临床实践中的有用辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验