Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014 Jan;7(1):161-8. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0165. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
Little is known about the cognitive factors associated with adherence to antiestrogen therapy. Our objective was to investigate the association between domain-specific cognitive function and adherence among women in a clinical prevention trial of oral antiestrogen therapies. We performed a secondary analysis of Co-STAR, an ancillary study of the STAR breast cancer prevention trial in which postmenopausal women at increased breast cancer risk were randomized to tamoxifen or raloxifene. Co-STAR enrolled nondemented participants ≥65 years old to compare treatment effects on cognition. The cognitive battery assessed global cognitive function (Modified Mini-Mental State Exam), and specific cognitive domains of verbal knowledge, verbal fluency, figural memory, verbal memory, attention and working memory, spatial ability, and fine motor speed. Adherence was defined by a ratio of actual time taking therapy per protocol ≥80% of expected time. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between cognitive test scores and adherence to therapy. The mean age of the 1,331 Co-STAR participants was 67.2 ± 4.3 years. Mean 3MS score was 95.1 (4.7) and 14% were nonadherent. In adjusted analyses, the odds of nonadherence were lower for those with better scores on verbal memory [OR (95% confidence interval): 0.75 (0.62-0.92)]. Larger relative deficits in verbal memory compared with verbal fluency were also associated with nonadherence [1.28 (1.08-1.51)]. Among nondemented older women, subtle differences in memory performance were associated with medication adherence. Differential performance across cognitive domains may help identify persons at greater risk for poor adherence.
关于与抗雌激素治疗依从性相关的认知因素知之甚少。我们的目的是研究在口服抗雌激素治疗临床预防试验中,特定领域认知功能与依从性之间的关系。我们对 STAR 乳腺癌预防试验的辅助研究 Co-STAR 进行了二次分析,该试验将处于乳腺癌风险增加的绝经后妇女随机分配至他莫昔芬或雷洛昔芬治疗。Co-STAR 招募了≥65 岁无痴呆的参与者,以比较两种治疗方法对认知的影响。认知测试包括总体认知功能(改良 Mini-Mental State 检查)和特定认知领域的言语知识、言语流畅性、图形记忆、言语记忆、注意力和工作记忆、空间能力和精细运动速度。依从性定义为实际接受治疗时间与预计治疗时间的比值≥80%。逻辑回归用于评估认知测试得分与治疗依从性之间的关系。Co-STAR 共有 1331 名参与者,平均年龄为 67.2±4.3 岁。平均 3MS 评分为 95.1(4.7),14%的患者不依从。在调整后的分析中,言语记忆测试得分较高的患者不依从的可能性较低[比值比(95%置信区间):0.75(0.62-0.92)]。与言语流畅性相比,言语记忆的相对缺陷较大也与不依从相关[1.28(1.08-1.51)]。在无痴呆的老年女性中,记忆表现的细微差异与药物依从性相关。认知领域表现的差异可能有助于识别依从性较差的高风险人群。