Phys Med Biol. 2013 Dec 7;58(23):8573-91. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8573.
Forty post-mortem breasts were imaged with a flat-panel based cone-beam x-ray CT system at 50 kVp. The feasibility of breast density quantification has been investigated using standard histogram thresholding and an automatic segmentation method based on the fuzzy c-means algorithm (FCM). The breasts were chemically decomposed into water, lipid, and protein immediately after image acquisition was completed. The per cent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from chemical analysis was used as the gold standard for breast density comparison. Both image-based segmentation techniques showed good precision in breast density quantification with high linear coefficients between the right and left breast of each pair. When comparing with the gold standard using %FGV from chemical analysis, Pearson's r-values were estimated to be 0.983 and 0.968 for the FCM clustering and the histogram thresholding techniques, respectively. The standard error of the estimate was also reduced from 3.92% to 2.45% by applying the automatic clustering technique. The results of the postmortem study suggested that breast tissue can be characterized in terms of water, lipid and protein contents with high accuracy by using chemical analysis, which offers a gold standard for breast density studies comparing different techniques. In the investigated image segmentation techniques, the FCM algorithm had high precision and accuracy in breast density quantification. In comparison to conventional histogram thresholding, it was more efficient and reduced inter-observer variation.
四十具尸体乳房在 50kVp 下使用平板式锥形束 X 射线 CT 系统进行成像。使用标准直方图阈值和基于模糊 c-均值算法(FCM)的自动分割方法研究了乳房密度定量的可行性。乳房在图像采集完成后立即用化学方法分解为水、脂质和蛋白质。化学分析得出的纤维腺体体积百分比(%FGV)被用作乳房密度比较的金标准。两种基于图像的分割技术在乳房密度定量方面都表现出了很好的精度,每对乳房的左右两侧之间都具有很高的线性系数。与使用化学分析得出的 %FGV 作为金标准进行比较时,FCM 聚类和直方图阈值技术的 Pearson r 值分别估计为 0.983 和 0.968。通过应用自动聚类技术,估计的标准误差也从 3.92%降低到 2.45%。本尸检研究的结果表明,通过化学分析可以非常准确地描述乳房组织的水、脂质和蛋白质含量,为比较不同技术的乳房密度研究提供了金标准。在所研究的图像分割技术中,FCM 算法在乳房密度定量方面具有高精度和准确性。与传统的直方图阈值相比,它更有效,减少了观察者间的差异。